학술논문
대리출산 자녀의 모자관계 결정기준
이용수 38
- 영문명
- Study on determining factors of legal maternity of the child born through gestational agreements
- 발행기관
- 한국민사법학회
- 저자명
- 권재문(Kwon, Jae Moon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사법학』제49-1호, 125~157쪽, 전체 33쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 사회과학일반
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.06.30
6,760원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The development of bio-technology and medicine has created new problems associated with family law, especially the rule to decide who the parents of a new born baby are. Among these, the hottest issue may be the determination of legal maternity of the children born by gestational agreements. In this case, there can be three candidates, one who carried the child, another whose gamete was used for this process and the other who managed this process intending to become mother of the baby. But the literature on this issue can divided only two opinions, because the last two, that is, the gamete mother and the intent mother is the same person in general case. Then, who is the mother of such child? Before searching for the answer, it should not be overlooked that it doesn t need to be treated as a zero-sum game. In this respect, such solution as respects intention of all candidates is the best. It can be summarized as follows: Although a child is born through such agreement, the woman who was carrying or has carried a child as a result of the ART process should be treated as the mother of the child. It is true that some literature argues that the so-called intend mother be treated as the natural mother, but it seems to overlook that the intent mother can adopt the child under much easier condition than others. Thai is, the parties who intended to be parents and led the ART process can be legal parents only through the court order holding that a child to be treated in law as the child of the intending parties. In result, regarding the parentage of the children born by gestational agreements, the semi-adoption system is considered to be an alternative. Therefore, there is no reason to justify excluding gestational mother from the life of the child. In addition, given the complexity and diversity of the modern family, the law should allow that a child may have more than two parents and that parenthood should not necessarily be an all-or-nothing status.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 견해의 대립
Ⅲ. 입양가능성을 전제한 출산기준설의 새로운 논거
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 BEST
더보기사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 NEW
- Journal of Asia Social Science Vol.11 No.2 목차
- Pentadic Criticism of T.S. Eliot’s Plays
- An Analysis of the Role of Religion in China's Foreign Exchanges from the Perspective of the Community of Human Destiny
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!