본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

賣渡人의 擔保責任에 관한 민법규정의 改正을 위한 一提言

이용수 44

영문명
A Proposal for revision of the Provisions of Liability for breach of warranty of the seller in Korean Civil Code
발행기관
한국민사법학회
저자명
金大貞(Dae-Jeong, Kim)
간행물 정보
『민사법학』제49-1호, 235~340쪽, 전체 106쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 사회과학일반
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2010.06.30
15,520

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

This paper has focused on my personal opinion that aims to investigate problems in the provisions of liability for breach of warranty of the Seller in Korean Civil Code now in force(hereafter current Civil Code ) and to propose a way of revising and a definite plan for amendment of the current Civil Code for the purpose of modernisation of our Law of Warranty of the seller with a view to come up the current Civil Code to the global standard. The summary of conclusions of this paper is as follows. (1) The current Civil Code provides liability for breach of warranty(ensurence that the goods conform to the contract) of the seller seperating from liability for non-performance of obligation of the seller to transfer perfect ownership to the buyer. But judging from the point of view of the theory of Liability for non-performance, the cause of separation of this two liabilities in current Civil Code is not logical but is merely historical. In my opinion, it is not only possible to consolidate two types of liabilities(a liability for breach of warranty of the seller and a liability for non-performance of obligation of the seller to transfer perfect ownership to the buyer) into one consolidated liability but also it is desirable. So I has proposed a Draft(the 1st Draft) that follows the model of German Civil Code(BGB) that consolidate two types of liabilities into one unified liability. But with regard to feeling of refusal for the unifying system and the convenience in practical jurisprudence, I has proposed another Draft(the 2nd Draft) that adhere to the system of the current Civil Code that provides dual liability for breach of warranty and non-performance. (2) It is necessary to revise the provision of the Section 568 of the current Civil Code to insert a provision for the obligation of the seller to transfer the perfect ownership of the goods and the obligation of the seller to deliver the non-defected goods that conform to the contract. The purpose of codifying the obligation to transfer the perfect ownership of the goods and the obligation to deliver the non-defected goods of the seller is to unify the system of the law of obligations by subsumption the law of liability for breach of warranty in the law of obligations by making clear that the nature of liability for breach of warranty is a kind of liability for non-performance. It means that the theory of a specific thing dogma is denied, and it means that the liability for breach of warranty in a specific thing that has a original and incurable defect is also a kind of liability for non-performance. Hence it is necessary to delete the Section 535 of the current Civil Code that prescribes liability for breach of pre-contractual duty that premise the theory of Impossibilium nulla obligatio and to delete the Section 462 of the current Civil Code that prescribes the obligation of a debtor to deliver the specific thing as existing condition. (3) In this paper I has proposed two types of Drafts(the 1st Draft is a draft that consolidate two types of liabilities into one unified liability and the 2nd Draft is a draft that provides dual liability for breach of warranty and non-performance) for the liability for breach of warranty of the seller to transfer perfect ownership to the buyer, the core contens of the 1st Draft is the establishment the new unific Article(Section 569) that provides condition and effect(remedy) of the liability for defective right(ownership etc.) and liability for defective goods deleting most part of provisions of the liability for defective right in the current Civil Code. (4) In the 2nd Draft I has proposed that it is necessary to codify clearly that it needs intention or carelessness for remedy the effect of the liability for defective right. (5) It is necessa

목차

Ⅰ. 序說
Ⅱ. 賣渡人의 擔保責任에 관한 규정상의 문제점과 改正方案
Ⅲ. 結語
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

金大貞(Dae-Jeong, Kim). (2010).賣渡人의 擔保責任에 관한 민법규정의 改正을 위한 一提言. 민사법학, (49-1), 235-340

MLA

金大貞(Dae-Jeong, Kim). "賣渡人의 擔保責任에 관한 민법규정의 改正을 위한 一提言." 민사법학, .49-1(2010): 235-340

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제