임상기반 간호학 실험논문의 질 평가

• 영문명: Assessing Quality and Risk of Bias in Experimental Studies on Clinical Nursing
• 발행기관: 한국근거기반간호학회
• 저자명: 정재심(Jeong, Jae Sim) 임경춘(Lim, Kyung Choon) 권정순(Kwon, Jeong Soon) 곽찬영(Kwak, Chan Yeong) 김경희(Kim, Kyung
• 간행물 정보: 『근거와 간호』제6권 제1호, 22~30쪽, 전체 9쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 간호학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2018.12.31

영문 초록

Purpose: This study was conducted in order to explore quality assessment tools applicable to research in the nursing area and to suggest the results of applying such tools in assessing the quality of experimental studies in nursing. Methods: We selected three experimental and 119 quasi-experimental studies with control groups in the Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. We applied Cochran collaboration’s tool for assessing the quality of randomized controlled studies. Also, items developed by researchers were applied for assessing the quality of experimental studies in nursing. Results: Three studies (2.5%) used an adequate randomized sequence generation and two of them concealed the allocation sequence. The 63.1% of the studies applied blinding and 51% of the studies did not have missing values, or had insignificant missing values. In addition, 85.2% were not likely to report selectively, and 36.1% were assessed to have raised the risk of bias. Conclusion: Many studies had too a high risk of bias to be used as evidence-based data in the designs and methods of experimental studies. We found that it is necessary to inquire into research designs, methods, and quality assessment tools desirable for evidence-based practice in nursing.

목차

서론

연구 방법

연구 결과

논의

결론 및 제언

키워드

Nursing Experimental study Quality assessment Risk of bias Evidence-based practice