본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

換率의 決定에 있어서 現代的 資本市場의 Monetary Approach와 Portfolio Balance 比較分析

이용수 4

영문명
A Comparitive Analysis Between Monetary Approach and Portfolio Balance of Exchange Rate in Modern Capital Market.
발행기관
한국해양대학교 해사산업연구소
저자명
최종수(Jong-Soo Choi) 김헌종(Hun-Jong Kim)
간행물 정보
『해사산업연구소논문집』제2집, 19~40쪽, 전체 22쪽
주제분류
공학 > 해양공학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
1992.08.01
5,440

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Financial markets are assumed to clear instantaneously, with perfect capital mobility ensuring Uncovered Interest Rate Parity(UIRP) is maintained at all times. Market expectations are for the exchange rate to depreciate at a rate proportional to the gap between its current level and its long-run equilibrium value. In the goods market, The price level is sticky, adjusting over time at a rate proportional to the excess demand. The conclusions of the monetary model are pressrved in Long-Run equilibrium. In the immediate term, since the price level is fixed, shocks which create excess supple (demand) in the money market have liquidity effects, requiring a fall (rise) in the interest rate to clear the domestic money market. The change can only be reconciled with UIRP if there is a simultaneous exoectation of exchange rate appreciation (deperciation). Given the assumption about the way market expectations are formed, this in turn is only possible if the exechange rate jumps to a level beyond (in other woeds, overshooting) its longrun equilibrium. The original Dornbusch model can be extended in a number of different directions to make it more realistic. However, there modifications result in models which sometimes exhibit under than overshooting. One derivative of the Dornbusch model, developed by Frankel, has been extensively tested, with results that are generally disappointing. Apart from a short period in the 1970s, it fails either to track or forecast the exchange rate adequately. Portfolio balance models concentrate not simply on the demand for money, but on the demand for a menu of assets. The demand for each type of asset is seen in the context of a general portfolio allocation problem and, since it is the proportion of total wealth to be help in a particualr form which is to be decided, the determining variable assets. So the demand for any asset as a proportion of wealth will tend to rise when its own return rises, and fall when the return on competing assets increases. We assume domestic resdents hold only three types of asset: domestically issued money and bonds, and foreign currency bonds issued by a foreign government or central bank. As in the Dornbusch model, (goods) prices are taken as fixed in the short-run. Under these conditions and assuming financial markets clear at all times, short-run equilibrium will be obtained whenthe exchange rate and (domestic) interest rate are at a level such that demand is equal to supply for any two of the three assets. Open market purchases of either domestic or foreign bonds will cause depreciation and a fall in the interest rate in the short-run, the reprcussion on the exchange rate being greater and on the interest rate smaller, in the case of operations in the market for foregign securities. Increas in the stock of foreign bonds can only come about as a result of current account surpluses. The short-run impact on financial markets is an appreciation, keepion the domestic currency value of foreign bonds constant. Long-run equilibrium is characterized by a zero balance on current account, as well as static prices, interest rates and exchange rate. The production sector adjusts to a disturbance as a resuit of changes in the real exchange rate. As the price level moves during the adjustment phase, it interacts with the (nominal) exchange rate to change the balance of aggregate demand and supply, hence generating a current account surplus or deficit which persists until the stock of foregin currency assets has erached a level consistent with long-run equilibrium. In practice, the portfolio balance model is difficult to apply and the approximations tested have not been very successful in explaining the facts.

목차

Abstract
제1장 서론
제2장 현대적 자산시장의 환율결정모형의 접근방법
제3장 결론
<부록1> Purchase Power Parity
<부록2> Fisher Effect
<부록3> Int'l Fisher Effect
<부록4> 환율변동률측정을 위한 제방법
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

최종수(Jong-Soo Choi),김헌종(Hun-Jong Kim). (1992).換率의 決定에 있어서 現代的 資本市場의 Monetary Approach와 Portfolio Balance 比較分析. 해사산업연구소논문집, 2 , 19-40

MLA

최종수(Jong-Soo Choi),김헌종(Hun-Jong Kim). "換率의 決定에 있어서 現代的 資本市場의 Monetary Approach와 Portfolio Balance 比較分析." 해사산업연구소논문집, 2.(1992): 19-40

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제