학술논문
폐 우좌단락 전신검사에서 관심영역의 설정방법 및 배후 방사능 보정 유무에 따른 단락률 차이의 비교
이용수 2
- 영문명
- Lung Right to Left Shunt Whole Body scan in the Setting and Comparative Analysis of Shunt rate Differences According to Background Correction
- 발행기관
- 대한핵의학기술학회
- 저자명
- 허상태(Sangtae Heo) 오태훈(Taehoon Oh) 고현수(Hyunsoo Ko) 최종숙(Jongsook Choi)
- 간행물 정보
- 『핵의학기술』Vol.28 No.2, 105~113쪽, 전체 9쪽
- 주제분류
- 의약학 > 방사선과학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2024.11.30
4,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
Purpose: Among nuclear medicine examination, lung right to left shunt whole body scan is excellent for confirming right to left shunt and has the advantage of enabling quantitative analysis. In previous overseas studies, the ROI was set according to the body contour, but radiopharmaceuticals remaining at the injection site included in the ROI result in shunt rate errors during quantitative analysis. Additionally, since there isn’t measurement or correction for background radioactivity, errors may occur during quantitative analysis due to sources invisible to the naked eye around the scan room and contamination of radiopharmaceuticals around the gamma camera. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in shunt rate according to the method of setting the ROI and compare the presence or absence of background radiation correction when analyzing a lung right to left shunt whole body scan. Materials and Methods: The study subjects were 31 people who examined lung right to left shunt scan from February 2023 to March 2024, with images acquired from four gamma cameras. The original data of the lung right to left shunt whole body scan and blank scan were set at four locations on the anterior and posterior of the body and eight locations on both lungs. WB ROI was set as a rectangle for Model I from cranial to knees, excluding the upper extremity. Model II was set as a rectangle from cranial to foot, excluding the upper extremity, and Model III included the entire body contour. A paired t test was performed to compare the difference in shunt rate before and after background radiation correction for each model. To compare the difference in shunt rate according to the ROI setting method, one way analysis of variance and post-hoc test (Scheffe) were performed between the models before and after background radiation correction. Results: This is the result of analyzing the difference in shunt rate according to with and without background radiation correction for Models I, II, and III. In Model I, the average and standard deviation before background radiation correction were 4.6±1.3%, and after correction, it decreased by about 17% to 3.9±1.3%. In Model II, the average and standard deviation before background radiation correction were 5.0±1.4%, and after correction, they decreased by about 18% to 4.2±1.4%. For Model III, the average and standard deviation before background radiation correction were 5.9±1.5%, and after correction, they decreased by about 20% to 4.9±1.4%. A paired t test on the shunt rate before and after correction of background radiation for each model showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The difference in shunt rate according to the ROI setting method showed a statistically significant difference between Model I and Model III, and Model II and Model III for the shunt rate before background radiation correction (P<0.05), and for the shunt rate after correction between Model I and Model III showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion: There was a statistically significant difference in all three models before and after correction for background count, and there was a significant difference between models depending on the method of setting the ROI. If the test takes into account accurate dose administration and patient posture, it appears that sufficient guidelines can be provided when performing a whole-body examination of right-left lung shunt. Setting the ROI as a rectangle from cranial to knees (Model I) is believed to be greatly helpful in diagnosing and differentiating right to left shunt by measuring and correcting background radioactivity.
영문 초록
목차
서론
실험 대상 및 방법
결과
고찰
결론
REFERENCES
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 폐 우좌단락 전신검사에서 관심영역의 설정방법 및 배후 방사능 보정 유무에 따른 단락률 차이의 비교
- 폐 환기/관류 검사에서 2D 단면영상과 SPECT/CT를 이용한 Auto Lung 3D 영상에서 섭취율 정량평가 비교에 관한 연구
- 선형무역치모델(Linear No Threshold Model, LNT)의 이해와 핵의학과 종사자의 방사선방호
- PET/CT 스캔 전 혈관 외 유출의 예측
- 갑상선암 치료병실에서 음식물건조기 사용 시 방사성액체폐기물 감소 효과 평가
- 사이클로트론 in-target을 이용한 [13N]암모니아 주사액의 제조방법 및 품질관리
- B형 간염 표면 항체 역가 검사의 시약 간 비교분석
참고문헌
관련논문
의약학 > 방사선과학분야 BEST
- CT contrast 검사 시 중심 정맥관을 이용한 조영제 사용에 대한 연구
- 의료용 인공지능에 대한 동향 분석 및 방사선사 인식조사
- 민간의료보험 해약 의향 영향 요인: 한국 의료 패널 2019년 2기 자료를 이용하여
의약학 > 방사선과학분야 NEW
- 폐 우좌단락 전신검사에서 관심영역의 설정방법 및 배후 방사능 보정 유무에 따른 단락률 차이의 비교
- 폐 환기/관류 검사에서 2D 단면영상과 SPECT/CT를 이용한 Auto Lung 3D 영상에서 섭취율 정량평가 비교에 관한 연구
- 선형무역치모델(Linear No Threshold Model, LNT)의 이해와 핵의학과 종사자의 방사선방호
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!