본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

The Significance of the Language of Arbitration Agreements - Focusing on the recent U.S. court's decision denying confirmation of arbitral award in Spineway SA v. Strategos Group LLC

이용수 0

영문명
발행기관
한국중재학회
저자명
Jung Won Jun
간행물 정보
『중재연구』제34권 제3호, 99~126쪽, 전체 28쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 무역학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2024.09.30
6,160

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution mechanism based on the parties’ agreement to arbitrate any dispute(s) that may arise, rather than to proceed with litigation before national court(s). Arbitration may be similar to court proceedings in some ways, but due to its characteristics, such as, confidentiality of proceedings, enforceability of final and binding arbitral awards, and overall efficiency in the proceedings, among others, it has been the preferred way of resolving disputes by disputing parties all over the world. However, without valid arbitration agreements or other dispute resolution agreements properly providing for arbitration between the parties, arbitration cannot be had. Therefore, the language of any arbitration agreement must be clear and without any ambiguity in order to proceed to an effective and efficient arbitral process. Foreign arbitral awards are readily recognized and enforced due to the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, commonly referred to as the New York Convention. Generally in Contracting States, a summary proceeding of confirmation of the arbitral award is had in the relevant national court, giving the award enforceability in the court’s jurisdiction. Recently, in March of 2024, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware denied the confirmation of a final foreign arbitral award based on one of the exhaustive grounds for refusing to recognize and enforce a foreign arbitral award pursuant to the New York Convention. Thus, this article focuses on examining such decision with issues of interpretation of the parties’ arbitration provision, unresolved question of proper jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, among others. Examination of such decision is necessary, especially in light of one of the parties having filed an appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals following this decision.

영문 초록

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. The Case at Issue, Spineway SA v. Strategos Group LLC
Ⅲ. The Text of the Arbitration Agreement(s) and/or Clause(s)
Ⅳ. Analysis of the Arbitration Agreement at Issue
Ⅴ. Concluding remarks
References

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

Jung Won Jun. (2024).The Significance of the Language of Arbitration Agreements - Focusing on the recent U.S. court's decision denying confirmation of arbitral award in Spineway SA v. Strategos Group LLC. 중재연구, 34 (3), 99-126

MLA

Jung Won Jun. "The Significance of the Language of Arbitration Agreements - Focusing on the recent U.S. court's decision denying confirmation of arbitral award in Spineway SA v. Strategos Group LLC." 중재연구, 34.3(2024): 99-126

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제