Application of surface-guided radiation therapy in prostate cancer: comparative analysis of differences with skin marking-guided patient setup

• 영문명: Application of surface-guided radiation therapy in prostate cancer: comparative analysis of differences with skin marking-guided patient setup
• 발행기관: 대한방사선종양학회
• 저자명: Jaeha Lee Yeon Joo Kim Youngmoon Goh Eunyeong Yang Ha Un Kim Si Yeol Song Young Seok Kim
• 간행물 정보: 『대한방사선종양학회지』제41권 제3호, 172~177쪽, 전체 6쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 종양학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2023.09.30

영문 초록

Purpose: Surface-guided radiation therapy is an image-guided method using optical surface imaging that has recently been adopted for patient setup and motion monitoring during treatment. We aimed to determine whether the surface guide setup is accurate and efficient compared to the skin-marking guide in prostate cancer treatment. Materials and Methods: The skin-marking setup was performed, and vertical, longitudinal, and lateral couch values (labeled as “M”) were recorded. Subsequently, the surface-guided setup was conducted, and couch values (labeled as “S”) were recorded. After performing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), the final couch values was recorded (labeled as “C”), and the shift value was calculated (labeled as “Gap (M-S),” “Gap (M-C),” “Gap (S-C)”) and then compared. Additionally, the setup times for the skin marking and surface guides were also compared. Results: One hundred and twenty-five patients were analyzed, totaling 2,735 treatment fractions. Gap (M-S) showed minimal differences in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral averages (-0.03 cm, 0.07 cm, and 0.06 cm, respectively). Gap (M-C) and Gap (S-C) exhibited a mean difference of 0.04 cm (p = 0.03) in the vertical direction, a mean difference of 0.35 cm (p = 0.52) in the longitudinal direction, and a mean difference of 0.11 cm (p = 0.91) in the lateral direction. There was no correlation between shift values and patient characteristics. The average setup time of the skin-marking guide was 6.72 minutes, and 7.53 minutes for the surface guide. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between the surface and skin-marking guides regarding final CBCT shift values and no correlation between translational shift values and patient characteristics. We also observed minimal difference in setup time between the two methods. Therefore, the surface guide can be considered an accurate and time-efficient alternative to skin-marking guides.

목차

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Results

Discussion and Conclusion

Statement of Ethics

Conflict of Interest

Funding

Author Contributions

Data Availability Statement

References

키워드

Surface-guided radiotherapy Image-guided radiotherapy Patient setup