학술논문
试论草创期外国人撰述中国文学史的体例特点
이용수 2
- 영문명
- An analysis of the viewpoints of the four earliest Chinese literary histories
- 발행기관
- 중국인문학회
- 저자명
- 李騰淵
- 간행물 정보
- 『중국인문과학 』제63집, 339~358쪽, 전체 20쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2016.08.30
5,200원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Following my previous research, which examines the Chinese literary histories of the twentieth century, this paper seeks to examine the characteristics of editors' viewpoints and their editing systems by looking at four of the earliest published Chinese literary histories, those of Russian scholar V.P. Vasilév ≪A Brief History of Chinese Literature: Очерк истории китайской литературы; Očerk Istoriī Kitajskij Literatur(中國文學史綱要)≫ (1880), Japanese scholar Sadakichi Kojo(古城貞吉) ≪A History of Chinese Literature: 支那文學史≫ (1897), English scholar Herbert Allen Giles ≪A History of Chinese Literature≫ (1901), and German scholar Wilhelm Grube ≪A History of Chinese Literature: Geschichte der chinesischen Litteratur≫ (1902). V.P. Vasilév’s ≪A Brief History of Chinese Literature≫ was the first Chinese literary history to take a comprehensive analysis of the different literary genres. It therefore not only examined poetry and prose, but also Confucian canon, history, philosophy, and personal literary works. Vasilév also partially explored novels and drama, which was influenced by his more Western literary ideas. Sadakichi Kojo’s ≪A History of Chinese Literature≫, which was the first Chinese literary history to base periodization on dynasty change, focused on more traditional literary concepts, and therefore mostly neglected the novel and drama genres. Herbert Allen Giles’ ≪A History of Chinese Literature≫, which also based periodization on dynasty change, was remarkable for including an examination of the literature of the late Qing dynasty, which was the ruling dynasty at the time of the book’s publication. Like his Western contemporaries, he held the novel and drama genres favorably and included them in his book, alongside poetry and prose. Unfortunately, much of his descriptions of the novel and drama text were incorrect, owing to his limited research into Chinese novels and drama. Wilhelm Grube’s ≪Geschichte der chinesischen Litteratur≫, while including analysis of literature from early Confucian works to the novels of Ming and Qing dynasty, placed a large emphasis on early Chinese works. Four of the book’s 10 chapters focus on literature from before the Han dynasty. What is most unique about his work however is that he quotes a substantial amount of text translated from novels and drama, and compares it to Western texts. After comparing these first four scholars with those of three Chinese scholars (Dou Jing fan竇警凡, Lin Chuan jia林传甲, Huang Ren黃人) who were published shortly after, I can affirm that the most important issue at the time was concerning the idea of literary concepts. Most of the scholars generally hold fast to the Chinese idea of traditional literary concepts, which favor poetry and prose, considered as elegant literary genres by traditional scholars, while ignoring or excluding novels and drama, as these were considered vulgar literature. Dou Jing fan, Lin Chuan jia, and Sadakichi Kojo are most representative of this idea. While V.P. Vasilév mostly based his writing on traditional literary concepts, he also included novels and drama due to his more Western point of view. This viewpoint is even more apparent in the works of H,A. Giles and W. Grube. If we evaluate these early texts’ acceptance of traditional literary concepts, it is easy to critique their viewpoints based on current thought. But they have own historical importance as not only the first literary histories, but as source material that sparked discussion on traditional literary concepts and helped shape future Chinese literary histories.
목차
一. 引言
二. 草創期外國人編纂四種中國文學史的體例特征
三. 與中國學者所著3種草創期中國文學史相比較
四. 余论
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 《看錢奴》의 인물풍자기법을 통한 표현효과 고찰
- 古代漢語 ‘乎’의 기능 기술에 대한 의문
- 戰國時期 秦石刻文字와 他系文字와의 字形比較
- 试论草创期外国人撰述中国文学史的体例特点
- 중국인문과학 제63집 목차
- 論《大公報》對輿論環境的建構: 以1909—1911年“民變”的報道爲例目
- 《審音鑑古錄》 본 《모란정》 절자희 특징 고찰
- 만청(晩淸) 소설 속의 중국의식과 정치상상
- 韓國의 朱熹 肖像 硏究
- 18 9세기 동아시아 전통연극의 지형
- 非受事动宾式复合词语义关系研究
- 50년대 중국 “당대문학”의 형성 과정에서 人民日報의 역할에 관한 고찰
- 중국공산당의 통일전선에 대한 화교의 지위 및 역할에 관한 역사적 고찰
- 計算語言學视角汉语顏色詞“綠”分析
- 2009, 혁명역사드라마의 탈이데올로기적 독해
- 대학 교양중국어 교육의 현황과 개선방안
- 六朝志怪小說中人鬼戀故事的類型及其中的愛情意味
- 從對外國文化和傳統文化的態度方面看嚴復和魯迅
- 云梦山洗尘洞戏曲石刻再考
- 中國人文學會 會則 외
- 江蘇省 呂四방언 두 음절 단어 連讀變調의 특성 고찰
- 韩国学习者在不同语言环境下的汉语学习策略分析
- 현대한어 '형용사+過'의 증가에 대한 인지언어학적 고찰
- 新HSK应试策略解析
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!