부동산 명의수탁자의 횡령죄 주체성

• 영문명: Can the Real Estate Title Trustee Embezzle the In-Title Trust-Given Real Estate?
• 발행기관: 한국형사판례연구회
• 저자명: 이창섭(Lee, Chang-Sup)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사판례연구』형사판례연구 제19권, 236~265쪽, 전체 30쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2011.06.30

영문 초록

Under article 4 section 3 of Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder s Name, the Real Estate Title Trustee can transfer validly the ownership of the in-title trust-given real estate from himself to a third person. Though section 1, 2 of this article provide the title trust agreement and the transfer of a real right to real estate (based on this agreement) shall be void, this act gives section 3 superiority over section 1, 2 to protect the right of a third person. From these provisions we can know that the title trustee becomes the custodian of the title truster s real estate in relation to a third person and is able to embezzle the in-title trust-given real estate. Therefore, if the title trustee does with the in-title trust-given real estate as he pleases, he embezzles the real estate of the title truster. The vendor is paid the price in full, and the duty of the vendor is regarded as fulfilled by article 4 section 3 of this act. So the vendor is never a victim. In this case(2009Do4501) the Supreme Court judges Gap(甲) didn t embezzle the property of Eul(乙). But it is proper that title trust between Gap(甲) and Eul(乙) is considered a kind of title trust between two persons, and Gap(甲) is judged to have embezzled the property of Eul(乙).

목차

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기

Ⅱ. 명의수탁자의 형사책임에 대한 학설과 판례

Ⅲ. 부동산실명법과 명의신탁

Ⅳ. 새로운 관점에 따른 명의수탁자의 형사책임의 이해

Ⅴ. 대상판결의 사안 분석

Ⅵ. 맺음말

키워드

부동산명의신탁 명의신탁자 명의수탁자 부동산 실권리자명의 등기에 관한 법률 횡령죄 real estate title trust title truster title trustee Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name embezzlement