본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

民事訴訟에서의 秘密保護節次

이용수 24

영문명
발행기관
한국민사소송법학회
저자명
표호건
간행물 정보
『민사소송』제11권 제1호, 181~216쪽, 전체 36쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2007.05.30
7,120

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Because of the intangible nature of a trade secret, the extent of the property right therein is defined by the extent to which the owner of the secret protects his interest from disclosure to others. Information that is public knowledge or that is generally known in an industry cannot be a trade secret. If an individual dis-closes his trade secret to others who are under no obligation to protect the con-fidentiality of the information, or otherwise publicly discloses the secret, his prop-erty right is extinguished. A fortiori, the Trade Secrets cannot be construed as any sort of assurance against internal agency use of submitted data during consideration of the applica-tion of a subsequent applicant for registration. Indeed, there is some evidence that the practice of using data submitted by one company during consideration of the application of a subsequent applicant was widespread and well known. The right to exclude others is generally “one of the most essential sticks in the bundle of rights that are commonly characterized as property.” With respect to a trade secret, the right to exclude others is central to the very definition of the property interest. Once the data that constitute a trade secret are disclosed to oth-ers, or others are allowed to use those data, the holder of the trade secret has lost his property interest in the data. In order for a reviewing court to uphold the trial courtʼs decision to exclude the public from proceedings or transcripts of proceedings, the record must dem-onstrate “an overriding interest based on findings that closure is essential to pre-serve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest.” Unless such an overriding interest exists, there is a presumption that the proceedings will be open to the public. The overriding interest can involve the content of the in-formation at issue, the relationship of the parties, or the nature of the controversy.

목차

Ⅰ. 序 論
Ⅱ. 民事訴訟에서의 秘密保護問題
Ⅲ. 一般公開原則의 制限
Ⅳ. 当事者公開原則의 制限
Ⅴ. 結 論
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

표호건. (2007).民事訴訟에서의 秘密保護節次. 민사소송, 11 (1), 181-216

MLA

표호건. "民事訴訟에서의 秘密保護節次." 민사소송, 11.1(2007): 181-216

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제