유럽연합 민사소송절차의 운용원리와 발전방향

• 영문명: Principes and development of EU civil procedural law
• 발행기관: 한국민사소송법학회
• 저자명: 함영주
• 간행물 정보: 『민사소송』제19권 제2호, 345~383쪽, 전체 39쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2015.11.30

영문 초록

EU civil procedure is not belong to the typical type of civil procedure in contrast with traditional civil procedure law. It could rather classified as a kink of dispute resolution in European Union. Holistic approach on EU dispute resolution system also helpful to understand EU civil procedure and judicial system. That s mainly due to the characteristics of European Union, which is forming legal personality that could be differentiate from international organization, federal states, confederation etc. The development of EU civil procedure or dispute resolution system could be summarized as follows according to the professor Calliess ; Privatization, Globalization, Europeanization, Digitization. Cross border dispute resolution is also urgent and pressing problems in EU. To solve or lessen these problems, EU designs a new system like preliminary references, direct action, enforcement action, action for failure to act, action for damage etc. Sources of secondary EU law comprises regulations, directives, decisions, opinions, recommendations, communications, white and green papers, convention and agreements. The problem of international civil procedure is also discuss lively. The Court of Justice of the European Union(CJEU) plays an important role in forming the principle of Primacy of Union Law. The CJEU itself depicts their role as the motor of EU. The Court of Justice shall consist of one judge from each Member State and be assisted by Advocates-General. The judges and the Advocates-General of the Court of Justice and the Judges of the General Court shall be chosen from persons whose independence is beyond doubt and who satisfy the conditions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Korea need to understand the change and reform of EU law because Korea-EU FTA officially took effect and EU law could directly valid to Korean trade company. Korea judicial system also need to receive a hint of court reform from EU at the age of system competition.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 유럽연합 민사소송절차의 개념 설정에 대한 문제

Ⅲ. 유럽연합 내 민사절차(분쟁해결론)의 발전 방향

Ⅳ. 유럽연합(EU)사법재판소의 조직과 특성

Ⅴ. 유럽연합의 민사소송절차 및 절차운용원리

Ⅵ. 유럽연합민사소송절차의 발전방향과 국가 간 시스템 경쟁의 시대

Ⅶ. 결어

키워드

선결적 부탁절차 대체적분쟁해결절차 민영화 글로벌화 유럽화 디지털화 분쟁해결생태계 유럽연합사법재판소 법률자문관규칙 지침 결정 의견 권고 집합적 권리구제절차 국가 간 경계를 넘는 분쟁(역내분쟁) preliminary reference ADR#alternative dispute resolution Privatization Globalization Europeanization Digitization Dispute Resolution Ecosystem CJEU Advocate-General Regulation Directive Decision Opinion Recommendation Collective Redress cross-border disputes