학술논문
미국, 호주, 한국의 난민정책 비교 연구
이용수 950
- 영문명
- A Comparative Study on the Refugee Policy in the United States, Australia and South Korea: Focusing on Policy Implementing System and Support Programs
- 발행기관
- 한국비교정부학회
- 저자명
- 권경득(Kyung Deuk Kwon) 이광원(Kwang Won Lee) 임동진(Dong-Jin Lim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『한국비교정부학보』제24권 제3호, 1~37쪽, 전체 37쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 행정학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2020.09.30
7,240원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
(Purpose) The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze refugee policies in the United States, Australia, and South Korea and to present the implications for refugee policies in South Korea based on the comparative analysis. (Design/methodology/approach) In order to compare refugee policies in the three countries, (1) refugee status, (2) refugee-related laws and systems, (3) policy promotion organizations and operating systems, (4) policies and support programs were set as comparison criteria. (Findings) First, the US hosts an average of 60,000 refugees each year, Australia hosts 15,000 people, and Korea hosts 480 people. Second, the United States and Australia accept refugees separately from foreign and domestic refugees, while Korea accepts only domestic refugees. Third, looking at the refugee approval rate, the US is 42.6%, Australia is 15.7%, and Korea is 4.1%. Fourth, on average, the refugee screening process takes 20-33 months in the US, 6-12 months in Australia. and 8 months in Korea. Australia s fast-track refugee approval process system is increasing the speed and efficiency of refugee screening. Fifth, Australia has included the Refugee Act in the Integrated Immigration Act, so refugee and immigration policies are organically linked. On the other hand, the U.S. and South Korea have separate refugee and immigration laws, so refugee and immigration policies are not interconnected. Sixth, Australia and Korea are divided into refugees and humanitarian residents through refugee screening and are differentiated in terms of duration of stay and support services. Finally, despite considerable differences in the level and content of various refugee support services that support refugees, the three countries recognize refugees as their own citizens and provide various refugee support services equivalent to their own citizens. (Research implications or Originality) First, treatment improvement and support services for humanitarian residents are needed. Second, the advancement of refugee screening and approval procedures and the rate of refugee approval should be increased. Third, it is necessary to raise awareness that can resolve stereotypes and prejudices about refugees of Korean people. Fourth, it is necessary to strengthen the capacity of refugee screening officials, introduce fast-track procedures and set up an organization dedicated to refugee screening. Fifth, it is necessary to increase the social integration of refugees by closely linking refugee policy to immigration policy. Finally, it is necessary for the response to the refugee issue to be pursued in a reasonable, objective and long-term manner.
목차
Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 선행연구 검토 및 분석 틀 설정
Ⅳ. 미국, 호주 및 한국의 난민정책의 비교분석
Ⅴ. 결론 및 정책적 시사점
References
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 노인의 죽음준비 정도와 사회적 지지가 죽음 불안에 미치는 영향
- 정부간 관계와 지방감사
- Welfare Magnets and In-migration: Do Welfare Magnets Work in Korean Local Governments?
- 한국 대학생의 영어학습 앱 현황과 수요 분석
- 정책내러티브 영향력과 전략에 대한 탐색
- 1970년대 신문기사에 나타난 새마을운동 특성 분석
- 인문사회기반 융합연구의 사회문제 대응과 기술영향평가
- 미국, 호주, 한국의 난민정책 비교 연구
- 공적연금 통합요인 우선순위 분석
- Development Aid from the Donor’s Point of View: An Institutional Analysis of British Aid to Statistics
- 지방정부의 국정참여제도에 대한 비교 분석
- Structural Relationship Analysis of Influential Factors on the Success of University Students’ Start-up: Application of System Dynamics Method
- 데이터 기반 행정법과 증거기반 정책결정
- 사회적 자본과 정부의 질이 주관적 웰빙에 미치는 영향 연구
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!