Strategies for Acceleration of Damaged Area Restoration Project in the Development Restriction Zone

• 발행기관: 인간식물환경학회
• 저자명: Seong Yong Park Sung Ae Jung Sang Jo Lee Jae Woo Chung
• 간행물 정보: 『인간식물환경학회지(JPPE)』제22권 제6호, 641~651쪽, 전체 11쪽
• 주제분류: 자연과학 > 자연과학일반
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2019.12.30

영문 초록

The purpose of this study is to derive institutional improvement methods for promoting the Damaged Area Restoration Project in greenbelts. The current status of greenbelts in Gyeonggi-do, where greenbelts are extensively distributed was analyzed, and the relevant laws and regulations were reviewed to suggest measures to promote the restoration project. The area of damaged areas within greenbelts in Gyeonggi-do was 6,121,024 ㎡, accounting for about 0.52% of the total area of greenbelts, and more than 80% was found to be located in Namyangju (55.49%), Hanam (16.48%), and Siheung (8.68%). Various measures to improve the policy were examined as follows: reducing the minimum size of the restoration project area; adjusting baseline of recognizing range of damaged areas; introducing the right of claim for land sale; allowing long-term unexecuted urban parks to be replaced as alternative sites for parks and green spaces; simplifying administrative procedures; and allowing public participation. All of them are expected to promote the restoration project within greenbelts. In results, when the minimum size of area for the restoration project was reduced from 10,000 ㎡ into 5,000 ㎡, 3,000 ㎡ and 2,000 ㎡, the ratio of the number of combinable lots to the total number of lots increased from 4.4% to 18.8%, 38.8%, and 55.9% respectively in Namyangju. Morever, when the recognizable ranges of the restoration project were extended to the structures obtaining building permit as of March 30, 2016 and obtaining use approvals before December, 2017, the number of applicable lots increased by 5.1% and 9.2% respectively.

목차

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Research Methods

Results and Discussion

Conclusion

References

키워드

damaged greenbelt area greenbelt institutional improvement revitalization