이중초점인공수정체와 연속초점인공수정체의 임상결과 비교

• 영문명: Clinical Outcomes of Patients Implanted with Bifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses
• 발행기관: 대한안과학회
• 저자명: 박수환(Su Hwan Park) 김성일(Sung Il Kim) 안정효(Jung Hyo Ahn) 신종훈(Jong Hoon Shin) 김수진(Su Jin Kim) 이지은(Ji Eun Lee)
• 간행물 정보: 『대한안과학회지』Ophthalmological Society,volume60,number9, 835~842쪽, 전체 8쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 기타의약학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2019.09.30

영문 초록

Purpose: To compare the postoperative clinical outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of bifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs. Methods: A total of 60 patients were divided into three groups, and each group included 20 patients of 40 eyes: group A with a +3.25 D bifocal IOL in both eyes, group B with an EDOF IOL in both eyes, and group C with a +3.25 D bifocal in one eye and an EDOF IOL in the other eye. We retrospectively reviewed the patients’ medical charts to analyze their binocular uncorrected visual acuities (UCVAs; distant, intermediate, and near) and refraction at postoperative 3 months. Results: The binocular distant UCVAs were 0.04 ± 0.01, 0.05 ± 0.02, and 0.04 ± 0.01 in groups A, B, and C, respectively, and there were no differences between the groups (p > 0.05). The intermediate UCVAs were 0.16 ± 0.01, 0.10 ± 0.01, and 0.10 ± 0.01, respectively, and group A was the lowest (A–B, p = 0.031; A–C, p = 0.018; B–C, p = 1.000). The near UCVAs were 0.05 ± 0.01, 0.24 ± 0.01, and 0.13 ± 0.01, respectively, and there were significant differences between the groups (A–B, p < 0.001, A–C: p = 0.009; B–C, p = 0.003). Conclusions: There were no significant differences among the three groups in binocular distant UCVA, and groups B and C showed better intermediate UCVAs than group A. Near UCVA was ranked in the order of groups A, C, B. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2019;60(9):835-842

키워드

Bifocal Extended depth of focus Multifocal intraocular lens Visual acuity