본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

첨단재생의료법안 도입의 주요쟁점

이용수 581

영문명
Issues in the Introduction of the Advanced Regenerative Medicine Act
발행기관
충북대학교 법학연구소
저자명
김현철(Kim, Hyeon Cheol) 윤이레(Yoon, Erei)
간행물 정보
『과학기술과 법』제10권 제1호, 39~64쪽, 전체 26쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2019.06.30
5,920

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The Advanced Regenerative Medicine Act includes both support and regulations, focusing on the implementation of advanced regenerative medicine(ARM). This is the result of considering that it is an industrial sector that needs to enhance national competitiveness and also an advanced medical sector that has unknown risk. Comparatively reviewing the ATMP Regulation(EU), Regenerative Safety Act(Japan), and 21st Century Cures Act(US), some similarities can be found, although the regulatory situations in each country are not the same. They share the problem that regulations such as clinical trials based on conventional drugs cannot properly regulate ARM. Therefore each country has developed new regulations and introduced new concepts such as ATMP, regenerative medical technology, and the Regenerative Advanced Thermography. It is also similar to the fact that the government does not rely solely on the role of regulators, but rather on the role of an expert group in the field of ARM. Although the role of expert groups in each country s regulatory system is different, they are required to play a certain role in deliberating such matters as scientific validity, safety and ethics on ARM and establishing regulatory standards. The proposed ARM Act is similar in this respect. The Act provided that the concept of ARM, and that the providing ARM could be carried out through the deliberation of a group of peer experts. The Act also provides risk-benefit analysis based on the risk of ARM and sets different procedures depending on the degree of risk. Furthermore, it is assessed that a regulatory system has been prepared to ensure the safety of all processes from before implementation to after. However, legislation alone does not solve the problem of regulating ARM. However, the fact that specific policy details and procedures should be determined by this purpose is an issue that needs further study.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 첨단재생의료 및 첨단바이오의약품에 관한 법률안
Ⅲ. 첨단재생의료 관련 규제의 비교법적 검토
Ⅳ. 첨단재생의료법의 주요 쟁점
Ⅴ. 맺음말

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김현철(Kim, Hyeon Cheol),윤이레(Yoon, Erei). (2019).첨단재생의료법안 도입의 주요쟁점. 과학기술과 법, 10 (1), 39-64

MLA

김현철(Kim, Hyeon Cheol),윤이레(Yoon, Erei). "첨단재생의료법안 도입의 주요쟁점." 과학기술과 법, 10.1(2019): 39-64

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제