특허심판원 2017.2.17. 심결 2016당1273 상표 권리범위확인(소극) 심결에 대하여

• 영문명: A Case Study Regarding Patent Trial Board Case No. 2016DANG1273 for Declaratory Judgement of “대한뉴스(Daehan News)” for Class 41
• 발행기관: 세창출판사
• 저자명: 최덕규(Duk kyu Choi)
• 간행물 정보: 『창작과 권리』2017년 겨울호 (제89호), 34~55쪽, 전체 22쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2017.12.01

영문 초록

“대한뉴스”(“Daehan News” is the transliteration thereof, “Daehan” means Korea) is a technical mark as an arbitrary mark which is inherently distinctive enough to register. Accordingly, the present case is not a matter of secondary meaning but a matter of distinctiveness as arbitrary mark. Distinctiveness of a mark is determined by the definition of the five marks: generic mark, descriptive mark, suggestive mark, arbitrary mark and coined mark. A generic term or a descriptive term should be disclaimed during the prosecution of the mark for registration. The disclaimer should be adopted in Korea as soon as possible. A trademark infringement should be handled by court. Declaratory Judgements by the Trademark Office should be abolished.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 심결문

Ⅲ. 심결의 문제점

Ⅳ. 상표제도의 총체적 난국

Ⅴ. 결어

Abstract

키워드

기술표장 암시표장 임의선택표장 일반명칭표장 조어표장 식별력 사용에 의한 식별력 descriptive mark suggestive mark arbitrary mark generic mark coined mark distinctiveness secondary meaning