합동범의 공동정범에 관한 비판적 고찰

• 영문명: A Critical Study on the Establishment of Jointprincipal Offender about the Collaboration Crime
• 발행기관: 한국형사정책학회
• 저자명: 김봉수(Kim, Bong Su)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사정책』刑事政策 第29卷 第2號, 147~172쪽, 전체 26쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2017.08.03

영문 초록

In criminal law, the ‘collaboration crime’ means that a person who accompanied by two or more persons, commits the crime of Article 146(Special Escape), Article 331(Special Larceny) and Article 334(Special Robbery). According to the common opinion and Supreme Court s Precedents, the meaning of ‘collaboration’ is the ‘cooperative relationship in the same time and space’. What matters here isn t ‘concurrency’, it s ‘cooperative relationship’. the ‘cooperative relationship’ is the mark of the principal offender in reference to the performers. In this sense, the principal offender mark called ‘cooperative relationship’ is distinguished from ‘Tatherrschaft’ as the principal mark involved in the act. Therefore, in order to be the principal offender of collaboration crime, the performers need to form cooperative relationships with each other in the scene of crime. On this account, the accomplice who can’t form cooperative relationships with each other in the scene of crime can not be the principal offender of collaboration crimes. In the collaboration crime, a person who don’t form cooperative relationships in the scene of crime can t take control of collaboration crime. This is the limit of the principal offender mark called ‘Tatherrschaft’.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설

Ⅱ. 논쟁의 발화점 : 대법원 1998. 5. 21. 선고 98도321 전원합의체 판결

Ⅲ. 합동범의 본질론과 정범표지의 연계적 해석

Ⅳ. 합동범에 있어서 정범의 표지와 그 성립범위

Ⅴ. 합동범의 공동정범 인정기준에 대한 비판적 고찰 -공동정범표지로서 ‘범행지배성’의 내용과 한계

Ⅵ. 결론 – ‘범행지배’라는 정범표지의 한계

키워드

collaboration crime joint-principle offender (through conspiracy) principal offender mark Tatherrschaft essential contribution