본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

[판례평석] 특허법원 2016.12.9. 선고 2016허6890 디자인무효심판 심결에 대한 취소소송

이용수 124

영문명
A Case Study Regarding Patent Court Case No. 2016HUR6890 for Invalidation of Korean Design Patent No. 711474 Based on Ornamentality through Physical Eyes and Obviousness of Dobby Fabric
발행기관
세창출판사
저자명
최덕규(Duk kyu Choi)
간행물 정보
『창작과 권리』2017년 봄호 (제86호), 48~65쪽, 전체 18쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2017.03.01
4,960

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Ornamentality of a design should be determined through human physical eyes. Of course, ornamentality of a fabric design should be determined through human physical eyes. No one determines ornamentality of a fabric design through microscope or magnifying glass. If so, it is not necessary to file a microscope photo or a magnifying picture when the design application is filed, because the microscope photo or magnifying picture is not the same as the actual design of a fabric. However, in Korean Design Patent No. 711474, the Examiner determined ornamentality of the fabric design with the magnifying picture rather than the actual picture of the fabric design. In the invalidation proceeding, the panel also determined ornamentality of the fabric design with the magnifying picture. If the ornamentality of the fabric design should have been determined with the actual picture of the fabric design, the subject design patent shall be invalidated due to the similarity to US D459,093. Both Examiner and Invalidation Panel state that the subject design has ornamentality due to big bead pattern and small bead pattern in the fabric design. However, the big bead pattern and small bead pattern cannot be seen through human eyes in the actual picture of the fabric design, but it can be seen through human eyes in the magnifying picture. Nobody can say that the actual picture shows the big bead pattern and small bead pattern . Korean Design Examination Manual provides that a dobby pattern cannot be registered for patent because it lacks creativity (inventive step or non-obviousness). Dobby pattern or dobby fabric is manufactured by a bobby machine which is designed to produce various weaving structures by varying the structure of warp and weft. If a dobby pattern is patented, nobody can produce the dobby pattern by the dobby machine. Nonetheless, both Examiner and Invalidation Panel state that a dobby pattern can be patented if it has ornamentality by changing the structure of warp and weft. They do not understand what the dobby machine can produce and why Korean Design Examination Manual provides that a dobby pattern cannot be registered for patent.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 심사, 심판 및 소송의 경위
Ⅲ. 심결 및 판결의 부당성
Ⅳ. 결어
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

최덕규(Duk kyu Choi). (2017).[판례평석] 특허법원 2016.12.9. 선고 2016허6890 디자인무효심판 심결에 대한 취소소송. 창작과 권리, , 48-65

MLA

최덕규(Duk kyu Choi). "[판례평석] 특허법원 2016.12.9. 선고 2016허6890 디자인무효심판 심결에 대한 취소소송." 창작과 권리, .(2017): 48-65

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제