학술논문
고린도후서 11:23-12:10의 네 가지 주제와 바울의 거짓사도 논쟁
이용수 363
- 영문명
- Four Topics in Second Corinthians 11:23-12:10 and Paul’s False Apostle Controversy
- 발행기관
- 한국복음주의신약학회
- 저자명
- 김철홍(Chul hong Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『신약연구』제15권 제1호, 131~153쪽, 전체 23쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 기독교신학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2016.03.30
5,560원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In the middle of the controversy against his opponents, reaching its climax in 2 Cor 11:13, where he labels them‘ false apostles’and subsequently ‘ servants of Satan,’ Paul unexpectedly turns our attention to his sufferings(2 Cor 11:23-30), and then to his escape from officers of King Aretas(2 Cor 11:31-33), who tracked him down as far as Damascus, a city located outside the border of Nabatean Kingdom at the time. Right after that episode, in 12:1-10, he mentions his having been taken up to the third heaven and suffering from the thorn in his flesh. What does Paul have in mind when he mentions four seemingly unrelated topics? What would have been the integrating motive behind them, especially in relation to his debate against Corinthian opponents in 2 Corinthians?
This study attempts to answer these questions by reinterpreting the four topics, which are his catalogue of sufferings, his escape from Damascus, his trip to the third heaven, and finally, the physical problems ensuing from it, in the context of false prophet controversies in the Old Testament. Placing Paul’'s false apostle controversy in the context of the Old Testament false prophet traditions gives us an opportunity to discover a consistent thrust running through all of the four episodes. False apostle controversy is a dynamic dimension of 2 Corinthians, even though it is often hidden from its ordinary occasional readers. However, it certainly provides decisive clues by which we may view the letter as an integrated whole. The seemingly loosely-related four themes are in fact quite closely interrelated. The unifying motive lying behind these issues is the controversy surrounding false apostles, prominent in the Old and New Testament alike. Paul’s defense of his apostleship is best framed against the Old Testament background that true prophets persevere through suffering, are rescued from harm by God himself, receive ecstatic visions, and experience weakness not as a divine punishment but as a gift.
목차
1. 서론
2. 왜 바울은 고난 목록을 열거하는가?
3. 왜 바울은 다메섹에서 탈출할 이야기를 하는가?
4. 왜 바울은 셋째 하늘에 다녀온 경험을 말하는가?
5. 왜 바울은 육체의 가시를 언급하는가?
6. 결론
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 공동서신에 나타난 구원과 선한 행실
- 누가복음1-2장에나타난주기독론과 하나님의나라
- ANeglected Area of Critical Attention in N. T. Wright's Perspective on Paul - N. T. Wright's Brilliant yet Unconvincing Reading of Romans 9-11 Concerning Israel's Destiny -
- 요한복음 21:1-11의 내러티브 읽기 - 베드로의 인물성격과 역할을 중심으로 -
- 신약의 최후행위심판과 구원의 관계
- 부자와 나사로 비유와 누가의 통합시도 - 누가복음 16장 19~31절을 중심으로 -
- 고린도후서 11:23-12:10의 네 가지 주제와 바울의 거짓사도 논쟁
- 신약기독론의 이중언어적 기원 - 종교사학파들의 언어적 전제에 대한 비평 -
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!