해리성정체장애와 전문가증언에 관한 시사점에 대한 고찰

• 영문명: Syudy on expert testimony of Dissociative Identity Disorder
• 발행기관: 원광대학교 법학연구소(의생명과학법센터)
• 저자명: 김희정(Kim, Hee-Jung)
• 간행물 정보: 『의생명과학과 법』제12권, 5~22쪽, 전체 18쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2014.12.30

영문 초록

Nowadays we have a lot of interest in dissociative identity disorder (DID) which was officially registered in DSM-Ⅳ-TR.. In the interest of continuity, This complex forensic case illustrates the creative interface between clinical and legal thinking because it challeng es both fields to think about issues of volition and responsibility that we might not otherwise have considered. The general legal standard for cri minal responsibility is determining defendants’ state of mind and capacity to control their behavior at the time of the offense. Application of this rule to a disorder that, by definition, is characterized by limited self- kn owledge and self control is not likely to be an easy task. DID is the mental disorder most strongly associated with child abuse, especially sexual abuse, and the issue is very controversial. However, the value of controversial evidence should not be ignored. Sometimes use of the more controversial evidence is the only way to establish a DID diagnosis. So enhanced admissibility of expert witness and evidence in DID cases would support concepts of fundamental fairness.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 해리성정체장애의 개념과 책임능력

Ⅲ. 해리성정체장애와 전문가증언

Ⅳ. 결 론

키워드

해리성정체장애 형사책임능력 전문가증언 감정 과학적 증거 dissociative identity disorder criminal responsibility expert testimony scientific evidence