양형기준 존중과 양형기준을 벗어난 판결

• 영문명: Sentencing Guidelines and Departure from Sentencing Criteria
• 발행기관: 한국형사정책학회
• 저자명: 김한균(Kim Han Kyun)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사정책』刑事政策 第26卷 第3號, 165~190쪽, 전체 26쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2014.12.30

영문 초록

Under Korean sentencing guideline system, judges shall respect the sentencing criteria of the guidelines when they choose the kinds of punishment and determine the periods of punishment. The sentencing criteria shall not have the legal binding power, but where any court hands down a judgment in deviation of the sentencing criteria, the court shall enter the grounds of its judgment in its written judgment. Rational sentencing policy depends on the rationalization of the sentencing guidelines. Sentencing criteria should reflect social changes and public attitudes to sentencing, and much more importantly, sentencing elements, both aggravating and mitigating elements for each definitive guidelines, and their evaluation should be systematized. The law may need to be amended to make sentencer enter the grounds of its sentencing decision in its written judgment for every sentencing under the guidelines. Such policy will makes criminal judges respect the guidelines, and the political aims of the sentencing guideline system, and thus public confidence on criminal justice system, including sentencing courts will be promoted.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론 - 양형기준 존중의 의미

Ⅱ. 양형기준의 이탈과 양형기준 준수율

Ⅲ. 양형기준 이탈 판례 분석

Ⅳ. 결론 - 양형기준의 합리성 제고

참고문헌

키워드

양형기준 양형합리화 양형기준 준수율 양형인자 집행유예 참작사유 Rational sentencing Sentencing guideline Recommended sentencing criteria Sentencing elements downward departure