강제매각의 별도집행에 따른 피해의식 연구

• 영문명: A Study Damage Consciousness Associated with the Execution of Another Forced Sale
• 발행기관: 대한경영교육학회
• 저자명: 권오현(Kwon Oh Heon) 전정수(Cheon Choung Soo)
• 간행물 정보: 『경영교육저널』제25권 제1호, 27~49쪽, 전체 22쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 경영학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2014.06.30

국문 초록

본 연구는 법원경매의 제도와 공매의 제도가 서로 달라 공매를 법원경매와 동일한 제도로 혼동한 국민들이 피해당하게 되고 이러한 피해사례분석을 통한 법원경매와 공매의 비교분석을 하여 양 제도의 서로 좋은 면은 받아들이고 문제점은 지적하여 불필요한 부분은 개정하고, 법원경매 와 공매를 대국민 서비스로서의 손색없는 제도를 개선하고자 하는 것이 연구의 목적이다. 채무이든 조세체납이든 강제집행의 대상이 되는 부동산, 동산 그리고 무체재산권의 강제집행과 매각이후 환가배당방법까지 전 방위의 통합방법에 대한 제도적 개선을 하여 중복 강제집행으로 오는 피해를 줄여야 한다. 법원경매는 채무자의 재산을 채권자의 신청에 의하여 집행되고 공매는 조세관청에서 조세를 강제집행하기 위하여 채무자와 체납자가 동일한 재산에 대하여 집행은 각각 진행되어 집행절차와 매각, 매각된 금원의 환가과정 이 모두 중복 진행되고 있어 국가에서도 이중집행으로 인한 지출경비의 국고손실과 매수인의 매각이후 타 집행기관에 의해 매수한 매수인에게 소유권을 박탈당하는 사례가 비일비재하다. 법원 경매와 공매의 중복절차에서 오는 피해를 줄이려면 궁극적으로 양 절차의 합리적 통합이나 조정을 위해서는 강제집행편의 통합이나 특별법의 제정을 들 수 있다. 이러한 단계에 도달하려면 관계관청과 더 나아가 국가의 의지가 있어야 가능하다고 본다. 그러나 설문을 통해서도 나타난 결과를 보면 이 분야의 전문가들도 인식하지 못하고 있는데 국가나 관계 관청에서 인식을 제대도 하지 못하고 있는 실정이 아쉬운 점이다. 따라서 법원경매와 조세체납의 절차, 제도개선이 필요하다. 본 논문에서 살펴 본 바와 같이 이런 일련의 문제를 통해 여러 가지 재산적 피해가 발생하고 있음으로 양제도의 통합 등 합리적 조정과 특별법제정의 입법절차가 필요한 시점이다.

영문 초록

Whatever the government's sale of private property Debts due to the creditors, apply to the court to proceed with the court auction to collect delinquent taxes from the tax authorities seized property auction that is enforceable. In the forced sale process Vicarious Execution on the civil court in the course of enforcement and national auction arrears collected on disposal of auction procedure law by national authorities forced sale because of the commonality. Lien against the same property enforcement court for execution based on the delinquent tax credit auctions and disposal procedure, if you are competing with each other auctions occur frequently are. Tills, of course, the debtor fails to repay the debt delinquent taxes are. The public does not pay the money that the tax information that is concurren. The two agencies work separately and have not been able to prevent any damage. I wrote a book auction and auction research and is well aware of the problem because Two enforcement and government agencies to work separately damage occurred. Harm reduction services to the government asking studied Zivilprozessrecht enforcement of the auction was a problem Punish those who bully the buyer did not have the law Difficult to acquire ownership of the buyer to amend the law From 1 July 2002 a new law is created to service. Part still has not improved, and a new problem by finding a great advantage to improve and refocus it, and, on the other hand, the short sale that is the basis of the relevant provisions of the National Tax Collection issues and legislative improvements to complement the deficiencies noted. The property of one of the debts due to the civil court for Vicarious Execution auction by auction by the auction process and the disposal of arrears of the line as a way to reduce the impact of the amount of the existing system of law enforcement agencies to revise the plan and unified. compared to enact new law, review the other hand, the introduction of the advantages of the current system and to improve the implementation of a rapid and low-cost way of emphasis. First, the issue of the court system of auctions and auction presented. The court system and the public auction of the auction, and the problem of the system proposed various theories were determined by the court system, such as auctions and auction sold separately enforced leave the target with the public and interested creditors, debtors who lease all in a relationship due to the confusing and overlapping in progress economic loss was present in the issues In the period from 2004 to the online auction to bid online auction site in the court auction still insist the problem is presented. order to deliver / extradite the court by providing the buyer to go out to the people who live easier way. Public Auction difficult to get out that there should be action proposed, Not intend to send the document to the debtor in court. Served on the debtor to evade court auction residents in brightness due to the sale generated a lot of time and money but it commonplace. Those who avoided service called Public Notice Public Notice to the system, but the process is time consuming and expensive, and the problem was presented, The procedures and time-consuming and expensive problems were presented, public auction bond debt set-off method is a problem, The auction of the court, to proceed quickly, there is next priority number declaration system, the public sale, problem in selling quickly that it does not have now. Court auctions and public auction methods of improving the problems presented. Auctions and estate auctions each court to enforce the same chaos and economic losses avoided coming to a method for operating a plan for the integration of the two major organs were present. Of the system is going to be a modern online. At public sale, and the Court of online auction bidding system and the introduction of the still on-site bidding in the sale

목차

요약

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 법원경매 공매 피해사례 분석

Ⅲ. 결론

참고문헌

ABSTRACT

키워드

court of auction public sale auction tax delinquency improvement of a system Execution