국내외 변리사제도의 비교를 통해 본 현행 변리사제도의 문제점과 개선방안

• 영문명: Reform Programs for the Improvement of the Patent Attorney System in Korea
• 발행기관: 세창출판사
• 저자명: 구대환(Dae-hwan Koo)
• 간행물 정보: 『창작과 권리』2008년 봄호 (제50호), 54~102쪽, 전체 48쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.03.01

영문 초록

The current patent attorney system has many problems. The most crucial one is that lawyers can acquire patent attorney qualification only by registration as a patent attorney to the Korea Intellectual Property Office. Another problem is that patent attorneys cannot perform their legal rights to represent in the patent lawsuit. Still another problem is that patent attorneys are not guaranteed for their legal as well as technical capability in the test for patent attorney qualification. These issues should be examined and cured to develop the patent system as an incentive system to innovation in the knowledge society, in which the importance of intellectual property rights are very high.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 현행 변리사제도의 소개

Ⅲ. 외국의 변리사제도

Ⅳ. 외국 변리사제도의 시사점 및 우리 제도의 한계

Ⅴ. 결론: 변리사제도의 개선방안

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

변리사 지적재산권 특허 상표권 디자인보호법 변호사제도 특허소송대리 연방순회항소법원 patent attorney intellectual property rights law school patent CAFC Korea Patent Attorneys Association(KPAA)