학술논문
상표침해소송에서 무효사유에 기한 청구기각의 가부
이용수 105
- 영문명
- A Study on the Trademark Misuse Defense focusing on the Korean Supreme Court en banc Decision rendered in 2012
- 발행기관
- 세창출판사
- 저자명
- 최승재(Sung Jai Choi)
- 간행물 정보
- 『창작과 권리』2012년 겨울호 (제69호), 99~129쪽, 전체 30쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2012.12.01
6,400원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Trademark Law itself has some restrictions based on the public order reasons. Article 51 of Korean Trademark law is one of the legal grounds for that purpose. Even some Trademarks have to be restricted from its exercising the right(s) considering the very nature of Trademark law when the intention of registrating that Trademark was only for the purpose of interfering the usage of the other Trademark holder and meet the requirements of the Article 2 of the Korean Civil Law(Prevention of Misuse of the Right). In some cases Korean Supreme court decided that no intention requirement is necessitated in case of Trademark misuse. This was the legal grounds of number of Korean cases in the trademark infringement case.
However, given the bifurcated system of Korea, it is not clear whether the infringement court can decide the validity of the patent or trademark before the validity proceedings is to be done. In early 2012, Korean Supreme Court(en banc) rendered its decision as to the possibility of the ruling on the validity of the patent before the validity proceedings are not completed. The answer to this issue was positive and the patent invalidity defense under the patent infringement proceedings are allowed afterwards. In the same of Korean Supreme Court(en banc) decision on patent invalidity defense, Oct. 2012 another en banc decision by Korean Supreme Court was rendered. That case allowed the court dealing with infringement case to declare the invalidity of the trademark. It's worthwhile to follow up the progress of the this line of Trademark Misuse Defense in Korean court from now on.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 상표법 남용 법리
Ⅲ. 대법원 2012. 10. 18. 선고 2010다103000 전원합의체 판결
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!