자백과 보강증거

• 영문명: Confessions and Corroborating Evidence - Focused on Judicial Precedents -
• 발행기관: 원광대학교 법학연구소
• 저자명: 김덕중(Kim, Deok-Jung)
• 간행물 정보: 『원광법학』제28권 제3호, 31~52쪽, 전체 21쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.09.30

영문 초록

A judge cannot convict a defendant of guilty despite judge's belief in the guilt of the defendant based on the confession with admissibility of evidence and credible confession unless there is corroborating evidence. This is an exception to the principle of free evaluation of evidence restricting admissibility of evidence and originates from a need to prevent misjudgement and to protect human rights. On the other hand, as for the corroborating evidence, judicial precedents support the theory of veracity security "the degree of veracity ensuring the veracity of the confession" in respect of the issue 'how much the corroborating evidence shall corroborate the confession. However, its standard is so abstract that the supplement to this is required.

목차

Ⅰ. 논점의 정리

Ⅱ. 보강증거를 필요로 하는 자백

Ⅲ. 보강증거의 자격

Ⅳ. 보강증거의 적용범위

Ⅴ. 맺음말

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

자백 보강증거 증거능력 자유심증주의 진실성담보설 confessions corroborating evidence admissibility of evidence the principle of free evaluation of evidence the theory of veracity security