본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

책임보험에서 직접청구권의 법적 성질에 관한 소고

이용수 117

영문명
A Study on the Legal Nature of a Direct Claim in Liability Insurance
발행기관
원광대학교 법학연구소
저자명
박정국(Park, Jeong-Kuk)
간행물 정보
『원광법학』제28권 제2호, 145~169쪽, 전체 24쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2012.06.30
5,680

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Liability insurance is a principle that the insured exercise the insurer insurance claims if an accident insurance should be occurs. But if this principle is strictly applied, the victim of an accident insurance will not get full compensation when perpetrators of the accident insurance become insolvent state. To solve this problem, our revised 「Commercial Code」 article 724 section 2 was the provision of the victim's own claim for insurers in order to strengthen the protection of victims. However, Our theories and cases of Supreme Court are two kinds of interpretation such as insurance claims and claims for damages, because this provision only stipulates the victim's own claim and does not reveal the legal nature. Initially after the amendment, theories and cases of Supreme Court adopt a contrary view and has been interpreted increasingly as a claim for damages after Supreme Court ruled insurance claims in since November 1997 up to date. German removed the controversy about the legal nature of the claim directly, by the 「Insurance Contract Act 2009 amended」 article 115 section 1 was the provision of victim's claim damages. Orthodoxy and the case of Supreme Court also has been interpreted as a claim for damages in France. Japan also has provisions of victim's claim damages if a car insured in compulsory liability insurance cause damage. But The United States and Britain has been interpreted as victims exercise on behalf of insurance claims of the insured, because the victim's own claim is not recognized in liability insurance. In a foreign country, opinion on the legal nature are divided such as our opinions. But our 「Commercial Code」 not clarify the legal nature unlike legislation of Germany, Japan, the United States and the United Kingdom. And the judgment of the Supreme Court has a problem of that the basis of claim is not clear. Therefore, I would like to seek legislative amendment for problems raised in interpretation of 「Commercial Code」 article 724 section 2 after reviewing the discussion in foreign countries and Korea.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 직접청구권의 법적 성질에 관한 논의
Ⅲ. 우리 「상법」상 직접청구권의 법적 성질에 관한 해석상 문제점 및 개정입법방안
Ⅳ. 결 론
참고문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

박정국(Park, Jeong-Kuk). (2012).책임보험에서 직접청구권의 법적 성질에 관한 소고. 원광법학, 28 (2), 145-169

MLA

박정국(Park, Jeong-Kuk). "책임보험에서 직접청구권의 법적 성질에 관한 소고." 원광법학, 28.2(2012): 145-169

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제