기업의 비자금 조성 및 사용에 대한 형사책임

• 영문명: Criminal liability on Rasing Slush Fund and Use it
• 발행기관: 중앙대학교 법학연구원
• 저자명: 서상문(Seo Sang Moon)
• 간행물 정보: 『법학논문집』法學論文集 第35輯 第3號, 79~96쪽, 전체 18쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2011.12.31

영문 초록

When the accuseds raise slush fund by using a borrowed-name bank account, illegal acquire intent was realized objectively, therefore embezzement come into extence. If company did agree on their rasing slush fund by using a borrowed-name bank account, the slush fund can be estimated as illegal cause trust property. Especially punishment and administration are levied on using a borrowed-name bank account by finance banking one’s real name law section 1 of article 6, section 2 of article 7, therefore the slush fund of object ruling is against good custom and public order, so the slush fund becomes illegal cause trust property. Because object ruling premise trust intent of campany, he had to judge true or not, the slush fund is illegal cause trust property. Even though, object ruling made a mlstake to ignore it and to give the guilty verdict.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 비자금을 조성한 행위에 대해 회사의 ‘위탁의사’가 있었는지 여부

Ⅲ. 차명계좌를 통해 조성된 비자금이 ‘불법원인 위탁물’에 해당되는지 여부

Ⅳ. 결론

참고문헌

[Abstract]

키워드

차명계좌 불법원인위탁물 횡령죄 불법영득의사 위탁의사 borrowed-name bank account illegal cause trust property embezzement illegal acquire intent trust intent