학술논문
인성물성동이논변의 교육학적 한 해석
이용수 104
- 영문명
- The Debate on the Similarity and Difference between Human and Things's Nature : An Educational Interpretation
- 발행기관
- 한국교육철학회
- 저자명
- 노철현(Roh, Cheol-Hyeon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『교육철학』敎育哲學 第39集, 31~62쪽, 전체 32쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 교육학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2009.12.31
6,640원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The purpose of this study is to interpret 'the debate on the similarity and difference between Human and Thing's Nature'(人性物性同異論辯) from the Educational viewpoint, and to reveal an implication of the debate in relation to Bukhak-Thought(北學思想). First of all, Yi Gan(李柬, h. 巍巖) insisted that the nature of human beings and that of thing is the same when Original Nature(本然之性) and Physical Nature(氣質之性) is regarded as two distinct entities. According to Han Won-Jin(韓元震, h. 南塘), the two nature should be regarded as one entity, so he argued that things have the Five Constant Virtues(五常) as much as human beings in relation to Physical Nature. Yi and Han's views reveal that the core of this debate is the problem of nature of mind and the world. According to this study, the above Yi's view of the similarity and Han's view of the difference bring forth the twofold structure of mind and the world, namely, metaphysical and empirical, which are necessary to explain educational activities.
In the light of common interpretation, Bukhak-Thought as the socio-political philosophy arouse in the later part of Chosun is based on the theory of the similarity, whereas the theory of Hwa-Iee(華夷論) the theory of the difference. But the theories of the similarity and difference in Bukhak-Thought and those in the original debate is not the same thing. According to Bukhak-Thought, our mind and the world is only regarded as the empirical, so it tries to exclude the metaphysical aspect of mind and the world. Therefore Bukhak-Thought is not based on the theory of the similarity, but based on the negation of the traditional confucianism of Chosun. In conclusion, it can be said that Bukhak-Thought tends to attenuate the metaphysical aspect of education which is regarded as educational criterion in traditional confucianism, whereas regards individual interests and motives as the criterion of education.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 인성물성동이논변의 사회철학적 해석
Ⅲ. 교육이론으로서의 인성물성동이논변
Ⅳ. 인성물성동이논변의 교육적 의미
Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 교육학분야 BEST
더보기사회과학 > 교육학분야 NEW
- 학교상담자가 인식하는 ‘좋은 학교상담자’의 특성
- 성인학습자의 무형식학습 프로세스에 영향을 미치는 요인들에 대한 연구
- 독일과 한국의 중등학교 교원 양성 기관의 교직과정 운영 현황 비교 연구
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!