본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

傳統的 經驗觀에 대한 Dewey의 批判

이용수 27

영문명
J. Dewey's Criticism on the Traditional Views of Experience
발행기관
한국교육사상학회 (구 한국교육사상연구회)
저자명
金柄吉(Kim, Byeong-Kil) 宋道善(Song, Do-Seon)
간행물 정보
『교육사상연구』교육사상연구 제6집, 101~115쪽, 전체 15쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 교육학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
1997.02.28
4,600

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The purpose of this paper is to examine John Dewey's criticism on the traditional views of experience and the foundation on development of his new experimental theory, which is a bases for understanding his theory of experimental education. Dewey criticizes the traditional empiricism, that is Greek view of experience and the modern view of British Empiricism. The Greek philosophers exemplified by Plato and Aristotle regarded human being as two substances of Logos and Phisis, or Reason and Experience. And the empirical world was excluded from the object of true knowledge because it was related to the practical living. Dewey criticizes their dualism and the narrow view of experience. But he agrees to their ideas that the nature of experience is not cognitive but primarily practical and actual. On the other hand, British Empiricists who were Locke, Berkeley and Hume denied the innate ideas that had been asserted in rationalism. They considered that experience was the only way of acquiring knowledge and it was formed passively by sensation. Dewey criticizes also their Empiricism because they considered experience as pure cognition, leaving out of account its active and practical element. But he agrees that they treated experience as important. After all, Dewey thought that traditional empiricism had the problem in use of experience. Thus, he claims his new Empiricism in which experience includes active-passive element, doing and knowing, acting and thinking. The nature of experience in Dewey is that it includes an active element of 'trying', 'doing' and a passive element of 'undergoing', 'suffering'. Neither mere activity nor mere passivity does not constitute experience. Experience is generated only when the two elements is combined. He thought that the basic principles of experience are the principle of interaction and continuity. The former means that experience comes from as an individual and his environment transact. The latter means that every experience takes up something from the preceding experience and affects subsequent experiences. But the two principles are not separated from each other. They intercept and unite. Dewey's this new empiricism which is founded on the basis of the nature and the two principles of experience is called 'Experimental or Naturalistic Empiricism'.

목차

Ⅰ. 序言
Ⅱ. 古代 희랍의 經驗觀 批判
Ⅲ. 近世 영국의 經驗觀 批判
Ⅳ. 새로운 經驗 理論의 形成
Ⅴ. 結語
참고문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

金柄吉(Kim, Byeong-Kil),宋道善(Song, Do-Seon). (1997).傳統的 經驗觀에 대한 Dewey의 批判. 교육사상연구, 6 , 101-115

MLA

金柄吉(Kim, Byeong-Kil),宋道善(Song, Do-Seon). "傳統的 經驗觀에 대한 Dewey의 批判." 교육사상연구, 6.(1997): 101-115

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제