최근에 제정된『秩序違反行爲規制法』으로 인한 社會的 波長

• 영문명: Social Repercussions Arising from the Enactment of the Law on the Public Order Violations
• 발행기관: 중앙대학교 법학연구원
• 저자명: 金鍾天(Kim, Jong-Cheon)
• 간행물 정보: 『법학논문집』法學論文集 第32輯 第2號, 199~250쪽, 전체 52쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.12.31

영문 초록

Recently the government promulgated Act on the Regulation of Violations of Public Order on December 2l, 2007, in order to execute efficiently delinquent fine. It announced that an amount in arrear shows a tendency to increase in every district because there are many cases that fine related to vehicles such as traffic and parking violation and for waste dumping is unpaid. Like this, the major cause of increase of an amount in arrear is that any additional dues or any disadvantages are not imposed on defaulters. After June 22, 2008, by the present Act on the Regulation of Violations of Public Order, delinquent fine for negligence for violations of public order payers will be disadvantaged. For example additional dues are imposed up to 77% of the unpaid fine for negligence. And their property can be attached by the delinquency disposition. However in reference to imposing a fine for negligence for administrative offenses against public order, similar regulations related to criminal tatbestand, illegality, tatbestand about criminal responsibility and joint principal offender and so on were legislated. It carries an important meaning to provide criminal crime tatbestand in the law of a fine for negligence which is a punishment for administrative offenses against public order that makes the necessary conditions for a fine for negligence precise. But administrative offenses against public order have been legislated taking criminal crime tatbestand. This seems to regard a fine for negligence as a punishment and the boundary between criminal punishment and administrative punishment for offenses against public order may be obscure. To fulfill duties efficiently at law and protect national rights and profits under the purpose clause of Act on the Regulation of Violations of Public Order, articles on conditions for completion of offenses against public order, fine for negligence imposition ․ collection and trial have been provided but I have doubts if it can truly protect national rights and profits. So in case of payment delinquency of a fine for negligence for administrative offenses against public order, the rapidity and the efficiency are too emphasized in Act on the Regulation of Violations of Public Order for collecting taxes which is the public purpose, therefore I raised the point at issue that this is an excess restriction as means for national safety device. When a fine for negligence is delinquent habitually and in a large amount, provisions about collection of additional dues, restriction of government-licensed business, offer information of defaulters to an organ of credit information and detention can infringe on property right and civil liberties(right of privacy and freedom of business), accordingly the legislator should continuously observe and revise that law. In public law, when legislatures make a law, it balances the public interest against the private interest. Also this issue is the principal of the proportion. It is the eternal issue about the law and the justice and the strict responsibility and duty that harass him to solve this problem wisely and without injustice to anyone. So the legislator should be always concerned about the sprit of the law, speculate modestly on human nature and rearm precisely the logic of the law and then he should make a law that can make trouble in the realities of law.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말

Ⅱ. 最近 制定된『秩序違反行爲規制法』의 내용

Ⅲ. 행정상 질서위반행위에 대한 과태료의 실효성 제고를 위한 법적 수단의 위헌성

Ⅳ. 맺는 말

參考文獻

Abstract

키워드

질서위반행위규제법(Act on the Regulation of Violations of Public Order) 가산금(Additional Charge/Dues) 과태료(Fine for Negligence) 감치(Detention) 질서위반행위(Violations of Public Order)