학술논문
종중재산의 귀속과 분배에 관한 연구
이용수 187
- 영문명
- The study on sharing of JongJung"s property
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 이우석(Lee Woo-Sug)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第25卷 第1號, 1~40쪽, 전체 40쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2008.06.30
7,600원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The member of JongJung(Korean Clan Association) sue to distribute it"s property, and a lower court received their demand recently. In this paper, sharing of JongJung"s property should not be permitted and the reason be as fellowing
First, according to the reports of supreme court of Korea, JongJung is unregistered nonprofitable association and the member of JongJung is the co-owner of it"s property. But JongJung"s property is dedicated to specific purpose, it is used only specific purpose. JongJung is different from associations administering the surface of the sea, village neighboring hillock and so on. If associations administering the surface of the sea, village neighboring hillock break up, it"s property is divided to it"s member. But If JongJung break up, it"s property should be used not for personal purpose for settled destination. Specially the property prohibiting to sell should not be divided to the member of JongJung.
Because sharing JongJung"s property is unfitted the purpose of foundation of JongJung"s, it need to amend the articles of association. It is not permitted the amendment to permit sharing of JongJung"s property because it is to change real nature of the association. The judge say that JongJung"s property is trusted property. But the trusted property is not for personal benefit but for common purpose.
Third, sharing JongJung"s property with it"s member is to make it"s social role lessen, to give good fortune to member who is not to participate in it"s meeting, and to harm the man who make a deal with JongJung. It seems that the man, who insist on permitting to share JongJung"s property with it"s member, think that JongJung play antisocial role in our society. But JongJung have played a importance role in working for the public good and it is necessary for JongJung to explore what it should do for our society.
First, according to the reports of supreme court of Korea, JongJung is unregistered nonprofitable association and the member of JongJung is the co-owner of it"s property. But JongJung"s property is dedicated to specific purpose, it is used only specific purpose. JongJung is different from associations administering the surface of the sea, village neighboring hillock and so on. If associations administering the surface of the sea, village neighboring hillock break up, it"s property is divided to it"s member. But If JongJung break up, it"s property should be used not for personal purpose for settled destination. Specially the property prohibiting to sell should not be divided to the member of JongJung.
Because sharing JongJung"s property is unfitted the purpose of foundation of JongJung"s, it need to amend the articles of association. It is not permitted the amendment to permit sharing of JongJung"s property because it is to change real nature of the association. The judge say that JongJung"s property is trusted property. But the trusted property is not for personal benefit but for common purpose.
Third, sharing JongJung"s property with it"s member is to make it"s social role lessen, to give good fortune to member who is not to participate in it"s meeting, and to harm the man who make a deal with JongJung. It seems that the man, who insist on permitting to share JongJung"s property with it"s member, think that JongJung play antisocial role in our society. But JongJung have played a importance role in working for the public good and it is necessary for JongJung to explore what it should do for our society.
목차
Ⅰ. 서
Ⅱ. 종중재산의 개념과 귀속주체
Ⅲ. 종중재산의 분배에 대한 판례 및 학설
Ⅳ. 종중재산분배의 파급효과
Ⅴ. 결
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 종중재산의 개념과 귀속주체
Ⅲ. 종중재산의 분배에 대한 판례 및 학설
Ⅳ. 종중재산분배의 파급효과
Ⅴ. 결
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 종중재산의 귀속과 분배에 관한 연구
- 독일법상 인터넷경매에서 의사표시의 철회
- 성년후견감독법제에 관한 고찰
- 미국 저작권법상 인터넷송신을 위한 권리
- 동산담보등기제도의 도입방안 - 일본의 동산양도등기제도와 비교하여
- 독립적 은행보증의 법리 - 그 기본 특성을 중심으로
- 다수의 부동산위에 설정된 근저당권의 법률관계 - 대법원 2006.10.27. 선고2005다14502판결의 검토를 중심으로
- 법인격 없는 사단에 대한 세법적 고찰
- 中國 農村宅地使用權에 관한 법적 검토
- 「유치권자에 의한 경매(민법 제322조)」에 관한 의문
- 契約修整을 위한 절차의 규범적 구조에 관한 고찰 - 독일에서의 요건론 및 효과론을 중심으로
- 附錄
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!