학술논문
민법 제393조와 불법행위법에서의 예견가능성
이용수 337
- 영문명
- Article 393 of the Korean Civil Code and the Foreseeability in the Tort Law
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 이용인(Lee Yong-in)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第23卷 第3號, 261~304쪽, 전체 44쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.02.28
8,080원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Article 393 of the Korean Civil Code specifies general damage and foreseeable special damage as the remoteness of damages and applies it to the tort law in accordance to Article 763. Dominantly, Article 393 of the Civil Code is regarded as a specification of adequate causation. This is called adequacy theory. Adequacy theory understands causal relation of the existence of liability and the extent of liability as adequate causation. According to adequacy theory, the existence of liability and the extent of liability have no distinction between them.
General damage and special damage cannot be distinguished by ordinary circumstances or extraordinary circumstances. Ordinary circumstances refer to the cause of damage, or the internal condition of conduct, and have no substantial meaning. In most cases, ordinary circumstances and extraordinary circumstances in causal relation conditionally combine to cause damages. Thus, it is difficult to distinguish general and special damages, and it might even cause unreasonable results.
General damage is recognized by average citizen or common sense and special damage asks the violator whether damage was foreseeable to decide whether it should be included in the extent of liability. However, special damage is very rarely compensated for and is mostly excluded from the extent of liability as it is generally not foreseeable for violators.
The foreseeability of general damage is vaguely expressed as average citizen or common sense, but the extent of liability can be changed with regards to its standards. Such standards vary in great depth and are post-evaluated from the perspective of average citizen. When common sense is understood as the official hypothesis, the range of causal relation becomes the extent of general liability. To limit the extent of liability, therefore, the foreseeability of general damage shall be evaluated by a reasonable person’s objective standard which was required of violators at the time of liability.
General damage and special damage cannot be distinguished by ordinary circumstances or extraordinary circumstances. Ordinary circumstances refer to the cause of damage, or the internal condition of conduct, and have no substantial meaning. In most cases, ordinary circumstances and extraordinary circumstances in causal relation conditionally combine to cause damages. Thus, it is difficult to distinguish general and special damages, and it might even cause unreasonable results.
General damage is recognized by average citizen or common sense and special damage asks the violator whether damage was foreseeable to decide whether it should be included in the extent of liability. However, special damage is very rarely compensated for and is mostly excluded from the extent of liability as it is generally not foreseeable for violators.
The foreseeability of general damage is vaguely expressed as average citizen or common sense, but the extent of liability can be changed with regards to its standards. Such standards vary in great depth and are post-evaluated from the perspective of average citizen. When common sense is understood as the official hypothesis, the range of causal relation becomes the extent of general liability. To limit the extent of liability, therefore, the foreseeability of general damage shall be evaluated by a reasonable person’s objective standard which was required of violators at the time of liability.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 상당인과관계 개념의 비판적 검토
Ⅲ. 통상손해ㆍ특별손해와 예견가능성
Ⅳ. 손해배상의 범위와 과실기준
Ⅴ. 결론
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 상당인과관계 개념의 비판적 검토
Ⅲ. 통상손해ㆍ특별손해와 예견가능성
Ⅳ. 손해배상의 범위와 과실기준
Ⅴ. 결론
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 교회의 분열과 재산귀속에 관한 판례법리의 변천 - 대상판결 : 대법원 2006. 4. 20. 선고 2004다37775 전원합의체 판결
- 民法 總則編 제5장(법률행위) 제1절(총칙)과 제2절(의사표시)에 관한 개정방향
- 미국 불법행위 법리에서의 안전벨트 항변
- 저작인접권자의 공연권 도입 여부에 대한 고찰 - 음반제작자를 중심으로
- 意思表示의 主觀的 構成要素
- 미국계약법연구서설 - 그 구조와 현대적 의의
- 해상화물운송장에 대한 법적고찰
- 의사의 설명의무에 관한 최근 판례의 동향과 그 비판적 고찰
- 영미법상 Consideration 법리와 계약의 쌍무성
- 미국계약법의 구조와 이해
- 착오규정의 개정시안에 따른 비정상적인 의사표시의 체계변화 및 농담으로 한 의사표시의 취급
- 민법 제393조와 불법행위법에서의 예견가능성
- 해지환급금청구를 위한 제3채권자의 보험계약해지
- 附錄
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!