학술논문
韓國經濟의 成果에 대한 세 見解-1960~70年代를 中心으로-
이용수 33
- 영문명
- Three Views of the Korean Economy, with reference to Its Performance in the 1960s and 1970s
- 발행기관
- 인하대학교 산업경제연구소
- 저자명
- 김대환(Dae-Hwan Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『경상논집』연구논문집 제2집, 125~147쪽, 전체 23쪽
- 주제분류
- 경제경영 > 경제학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 1988.06.01
5,560원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The purpose of this paper is to classify and compare various views on Korean economic performance in the 1960s and 1970s. These views which are expressed in materials written mostly during the 1970s are lined up, according to their positions : a) the neo-classical school, b) the dependency school and c) the structuralists.
The neo-classical school, at the positive end of the spectrum, regard the Korean economy as a model of success for developing countries and admire its rapid growth through export expansion. The dependency school, in the opposing camp. believe that Korea's growth led to deepening economic dependence, with undesirable social costs. The third group, the structuralists, do not accept or reject the value of export-led growth per se but rather are critical of what they believe to be structural distortions in the ecomomy arising from the nature of growth followed.
Though the efforts of each of these three groups are useful in revealing some aspects of the Korean economy, they have failed to present an adquate analytical framework for evaluating the structural development of the economy. The neo-classical school have uncritically equated aggregate output growth with structural development or progress. The arguments of the dependency school are rigidly guided by their own perceptions, not based on concrete analyses. Among the Korean structuralists, there is an evident streak of nationalism, and their concept or standard of 'self-reliance' is not very clear. They have rather adopted a somewhat piecemeal approach.
This paper, lastly, points out the necessity and importance of a systematic comparison and evaluation of various views of the Korean economy which have been mounting up. Two useful ways for this are suggested : a) micro-comparisons by fields and b) building-up of a comprehensive analytical framework.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 신고전파적 견해
Ⅲ. 종속학파적 견해
Ⅳ. 구조주의자의 견해
Ⅴ. 각 견해의 요약 및 문제점
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 第3世界의 資本主義發展과 多國籍企業의 役割
- 從業員의 職業態度에 관한 硏究-離職意圖를 中心으로-
- 韓國의 消費稅制-酒稅制度의 問題點과 改善方案을 中心으로-
- 競爭力 强化를 위한 MIS 導入에 관한 硏究-經營者의 役割을 中心으로-
- 韓國經濟의 成果에 대한 세 見解-1960~70年代를 中心으로-
- 現金配當支給과 公示時期의 情報內容에 관한 實證的 硏究
- 共分散行列의 크기와 裁定價格決定理論의 實證的 檢證
- 競爭戰略과 生産戰略에 關한 硏究
- 會計理論의 패러다임 收容에 관한 考察
- 동북아시아에 있어 면직물 교역 패턴
- 管理變動 換率制度하의 不胎化 政策
- 韓國의 資金會計動向에 관한 硏究
참고문헌
관련논문
경제경영 > 경제학분야 NEW
- Optimizing Business Opportunities: The Evolving Landscape of Smart Cities in South Korea
- Does Paid Sick Leave Induce Welfare Burden?
- Economic Growth and Employment in the Korean Agri-Food Industry: Examining the Buffering Effect and Sensitivity of Temporary Employment
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!