학술논문
미국법상 순수재산손해의 법리
이용수 79
- 영문명
- Youngjoon Kwon, Associate Professor, School of Law, Seoul National University
- 발행기관
- 한국민사법학회
- 저자명
- 권영준(Youngjoon Kwon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사법학』제58호, 145~190쪽, 전체 46쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 사회과학일반
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2012.03.31
8,320원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In general, pure economic loss is understood as economic loss without antecedent harm to plaintiff’s person or property. In a number of countries such as England, the United States, and Germany, the compensation for pure economic loss is denied in principle. The purpose of this paper is to examine the pure economic loss doctrine as discussed in the United States. This doctrine has evolved in the realm of negligence law in the 19th century with liberalism as its philosophical background. The United States Supreme Court decision on Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint in 1927 has served as a milestone decision in the development of this doctrine. On the whole, most of the courts in the U.S. still adhere to this doctrine, thereby denying compensation for pure economic loss in principle. The prevention of endless liability, the contract primacy and the efficiency rationale are presented as the justification grounds. However, there are certain decisions that mitigate the rigidity of this doctrine by allowing exceptions in professional liability cases or oil-spill cases. As of 2011, the American Law Institute is proceeding with restating this doctrine and now has come up with the first preliminary draft on the first chapter of the restatement. The pure economic doctrine as is understood in the United States is not directly applicable to Korea where tort law regime is totally different. The underlying rationales, at least from a Korean perspective, are not fully convincing either. However, its keen awareness of the relationship between the protected interest and the tortious liability, as well as its theoretical framework that explicitly focuses on the positioning of the tort law as opposed to other areas of law such as contract law or insurance law, have meaningful implications on Korean law.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 논의의 배경
Ⅲ. 미국 판례의 형성과 그 이론적 정당화
Ⅳ. 리스테이트먼트 제정작업의 현황
Ⅴ. 평가
Ⅵ. 시사점 - 결론에 갈음하여
참고문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 BEST
더보기사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 NEW
- The Current Situation, Problems and Solutions of China's Basic Legal System of Digital Economy under the Background of Global Digital Governance
- Persistence and Breakthrough: Opportunities, Missions and Challenges of School Sports Development Under the “Double Reduction” Policy
- Research on the Issue of Chinese Youth Subculture Group in the Phenomenon of “Economic Fever”
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!