본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

공서양속에 반하는 중재판결

이용수 10

영문명
Arbitration awards against public policy; in regards to economic sanctions
발행기관
한국중재학회
저자명
한수민(Soomin Han) 김진비(Jinbi Kim) 이재혁(Jaehyuk Lee)
간행물 정보
『중재연구』제34권 제1호, 27~50쪽, 전체 24쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 무역학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2024.03.30
5,680

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

This paper examines issues concerning conflicts between arbitral awards and public interests, particularly with respect to economic sanctions. Sanctions have been widely used by political entities, such as States and organizations, as means to promote public interests and to resolve cross-border disputes. In particular, economic sanctions have been increasingly more visible in recent years due to the accelerating fragmentation of the international communities, and their magnitude and range of the impacts have grown accordingly. For example, the U.S. and the EU have imposed economic sanctions on Russia and related persons in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The U.S. recently re-introduced a comprehensive economic sanction on Iran. One of the notable impacts of the sanctions, particularly economic sanctions, is that on international arbitration. Sanctions are essentially built on the notion of the protection of public interests, and public interests are some of the few grounds upon which recognition and enforceability or arbitral awards may be rejected. However, jurisprudence on such conflict between sanctions and arbitral awards have not been sufficiently addressed in Korea because court case and administrative decision records on this conflict have not been sufficiently accumulated. In this regard, this paper begins with offering a survey of the concept of public interests, economic and trade sanctions, arbitral awards and their enforceability, and the relationships between them. It then examines the mechanism upon which public interests, trade and economic sanctions may lead certain arbitral awards unenforceable. Next, the paper suggests judiciaries’ balanced approach toward the public interests protected by trade and economic sanctions and the predictability and fairness in the enforcement of arbitral awards. Finally, this paper concludes with the methods of the implementation of such balanced approach.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 언
Ⅱ. 경제제재의 종류
Ⅲ. 공서양속에 대한 중재 상의 판단
Ⅳ. 경제제재와 공서양속의 관계
V. 결 론
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

한수민(Soomin Han),김진비(Jinbi Kim),이재혁(Jaehyuk Lee). (2024).공서양속에 반하는 중재판결. 중재연구, 34 (1), 27-50

MLA

한수민(Soomin Han),김진비(Jinbi Kim),이재혁(Jaehyuk Lee). "공서양속에 반하는 중재판결." 중재연구, 34.1(2024): 27-50

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제