준공현장의 분쟁해결방안으로서의 사후적 공정분석에 관한 연구

• 영문명: Studies on Post Contract Schedule Analysis
• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: 고기혁 박성필 김용길
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』제32권 제4호, 103~141쪽, 전체 39쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2022.12.31

영문 초록

Traditionally, schedule analysis in Korea has been used, mainly through the Critical Path Method, to evaluate the claim for extension of time and/or the amount of liquidated damages for delay. Critical path method, however, cannot identify the delay event and its impact occurred in non-critical path especially in multi facility projects. In multi facility projects that comprise several independent but related facilities or structures, each facility has its own facility critical path the duration of which will be impacted by facility specific critical delays. Thus, only through the non-critical delay analysis along with the critical delay analysis damages not attributable to contractors may be remedied in full. Because all the records and pictures can reveal what has actually happened in post contract review, only the retrospective analysis rather than the prospective analysis based on the assumptions can establish the cause and allocate the each parties’ responsibilities appropriately.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 공정분석의 국내적용 현황 및 문제점

Ⅲ. 공정분석에 대한 방법론 및 개선 필요성

Ⅳ. 복합 시설물 공정분석 사례(APAB With Window Analysis)

Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌

키워드

Non-critical path Facility critical path Multi facility projects Retrospective analysis Post-contract review