학술논문
悔窩 安重觀의 文學論 硏究
이용수 0
- 영문명
- A study on the literary theory of Hoewa AnJunggwan
- 발행기관
- 동방한문학회
- 저자명
- 金英珠(Kim, Young-Ju)
- 간행물 정보
- 『동방한문학』제40호, 1~12쪽, 전체 12쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2009.09.30
4,240원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In the 18th century, the prose theory was bisected by KimChanghyeop faction and Heomok faction. This thesis aims at a study of the prose theory of Hoewa AnJunggwan who was treated distantly by those faction. As a result, I derive some conclusion from the prose theory of Hoewa AnJunggwan. : First. A key point of Hoewa s theory is the purity conservation and a close examination of Doe[道]. Second. Hoewa insists Doe s Che[體] and Yong[用] as a selection criterion. He recommended 「Taegeukdoseol」 and 「Seomyeong」as a standard which equipped with Doe s Che, and 「Jeonchulsapyo」, Jeongho and Juja s Bongsa, Yubun and Hojeon s Daechaek as a standard which equipped with Doe s yong. These standards are faithful to Yuga´s ideology and have an eye to a daily usefulness. In these point, Hoewa s prose theory is similar to KimChanghyeop faction s theory. Third. In a form of description, Hoewa emphasis on the Sil[實]. It means the truth and denounce a description with embellishment. Fourth. In the field of the creative literature, Hoewa emphasis on the originality. He summarize is as Jawee[自爲]·Dokjijigyeon[獨至之見], etc. Fifth. Hoewa insists that between Chosen writer and China s writer doesn t exist superiority and inferiority, just exist the geographical and geopolitical difference.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 悔窩의 文學論
3. 결론
참고문헌
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!