Legitimating Irreconcilable Views on Campaign Financing: Is Paying $200,000 to a Fellow Candidate a Bribe or Money-for-favor?

• 발행기관: 한국비교정부학회
• 저자명: Jiwon Nam
• 간행물 정보: 『한국비교정부학보』제17권 제1호, 23~42쪽, 전체 20쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 행정학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2013.04.30

영문 초록

The Tussle between Kwak Ro-Hyun and Park, Myoung-Ki, two candidates in the election for superintendent of the year 2010 in Seoul, is analyzed by how two different logics of appropriateness control the interactive disintegration of social construction. The analysis is based on data that exist with paradoxes, such as news from mainstream media; broadcasting editorials and articles about and interviews with Kwak and Park by main press outlets; a letter Park wrote while in prison; and numerous précis shown on the Internet with various sensemaking phenomena that constantly form, change, and break down. The results of this analysis indicate that it would be worthwhile to further pursue the role of micro-macro linkages in institutional dynamics by examining how organizational dynamics interact in institutional processes. On a larger scale, the sensemaking systems are homogeneous, while on a smaller scale, they are heterogeneous. The arguments between Kwak and Park are extreme examples of this. In terms of their presentations of internal desires, formed from their past socialization processes, the two candidates appear identical.

목차

I. Introduction

II. Data Collection, Methodology and Theoretical Review

III. The Background of the 2010 Superintendent Election

IV. Different Legitimacies of Two Leaders

V. Ongoing Legitimization from Idealism to Eclecticism: Sensemaking

VI. Dialectic Conclusion: Sensegivers Exist, but Where are Sensemakers?

References

키워드

사회적 구성 적절성의 논리 센스메이킹 정당화 교육감선거 Social Construction Logic of Appropriateness Sensemaking Legitimating Superintendent Election