유착성 관절낭염에 대한 추나요법의 효과: 체계적 문헌고찰과 메타분석

• 영문명: Chuna Manual Therapy for Adhesive Capsulitis : A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
• 발행기관: 척추신경추나의학회
• 저자명: 조주찬(Ju-Chan Cho) 허인(In Heo) 박선영(Sun-Young Park) 신병철(Byung-Cheul Shin)
• 간행물 정보: 『척추신경추나의학회지』척추신경추나의학회지 제14권 제2호, 1~14쪽, 전체 14쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 한의학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2019.12.30

영문 초록

Objectives : To evaluate the effectiveness of Chuna Manual Therapy for adhesive capsulitis by a systematic review manner. Methods : Five foreign electronic databases (Pubmed, Ovid-medline, Embase, Cochrane library, Chinese Academic Journals (CAJ)) and two Korean medical electronic databases (Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS) and Research Information Sharing Service (RISS)) were searched to find all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using Chuna Manual Therapy as a treatment for adhesive capsulitis. The methodological quality of each RCT was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results : Twenty-one RCTs met our inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed positive results on the use of Chuna Manual Therapy combined with acupuncture or exercise therapy in terms of the efficacy rate and pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), compared to acupuncture or exercise alone [SMD-1.81 (95% CI & -2.54, -1.08), P<0.001, RR 1.19 (95% CI 1.14, 1.23), P<0.001)]. Positive results in terms of efficacy rate were also obtained comparing Chuna Manual Therapy to acupuncture alone [RR 1.10 (95% CI 1.02, 1.18), P=0.01]. Conclusions : Our systematic review found favorable results on the effectiveness of Chuna Manual Therapy for pain and efficacy rate of adhesive capsulitis. However, evidence was limited due to the lack of well-designed RCTs. More qualified clinical trials are needed to obtain stronger evidence.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 대상과 방법

Ⅲ. 결 과

Ⅳ. 고찰 및 결론

Ⅴ. 참고문헌

키워드

Chuna manual therapy Adhesive capsulitis Systematic review Meta-analysis Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis