‘부양의 의무가 있다’와 ‘특별히 부양하거나’라는 문언의 성질 차이

• 영문명: The Differences of ‘shall be under a duty to furnish support’ and ‘has specially supported’
• 발행기관: 한국가족법학회
• 저자명: 옥도진(Og, Do-Jin)
• 간행물 정보: 『가족법연구』家族法硏究 第35卷 2號, 259~312쪽, 전체 54쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2021.07.31

영문 초록

Critical views : There is a difference in the way of interpretation between Sollen-Norm text and Sein(fact)-Aussage(statement) text. The Sein(fact)-Aussage(statement) text of “specially” in Article 1008-2(Contributory Portion) (1) is an indeterminate concept that requires a value judgment. In order to prevent arbitrary judgment of the courts, concrete work is required (based on specific and relative standards). Laws that can be quantitatively evaluated and the reality of social-economic transactions are firmly established. It is based on Kelsen’s theory. The regulation and interpretation of the obligation to mediate in Article 2057a of the German Civil Code(German BGB) and the bequest of care in Article 677 of the Austrian Civil Code(Austria BGB) are close to the judgment of “specially” in Article 1008-2(Contributory Portion) (1) based on the ‘specific and relative standards’ of the Critical views. We can see that the courts will follow the Critical views in the future. The court will show the most clearly (predictable) case type, “cohabiting and providing nursing the inheritee with a severe disease or disability for a long time”.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. “특별히 부양하거나”라는 문언에 대한 비교법적 재검토

Ⅲ. 법률해석의 정당성과 “특별히 부양하거나”라는 문언의 성질

Ⅳ. 부양기여의 특별성 판단을 위한 사안유형화에 의한 구체화 방법

Ⅴ. 결 론

키워드

켈젠 부양기여 특별성 부양의무 법률해석 유형화 Kelsen Special support duty of support besonderem Maße Unterhalts- pflicht Statutory Interpretation Categorization