중재인 선정과 법원의 역할에 관한 연구

• 영문명: Appointment of Arbitrators and the Role of the Court
• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: 박원형 김철호
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』 제20권 제2호, 49~65쪽, 전체 17쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.08.30

영문 초록

The expanded role of courts in arbitral procedures is said to have certain detrimental effects on the cost-effective approach to arbitration. This is the case when the court is appointing an arbitrator, pursuant to the specific domestic legal regime. The danger of decisions, especially those with expanded role of courts can create delays and hurdles. Even with contradictory viewpoints, the role of the court should complement the arbitral tribunal and not impede the functioning of arbitration independent of the judicial system. In this paper, two recent cases in Korean Supreme Court are reviewed, trying to find the proper implications on further arbitration practices especially in the stage of arbitrator appointment. Even though the proper appointment of arbitrators is essential to the existence of valid arbitration proceedings, appointment of arbitrators by the courts should constitute an administrative power, and not a judicial power. The cases reviewed make clear that the court must play a facilitative role in international commercial arbitration by assisting the parties in appointing the arbitral tribunal, the court intervention must be kept to a minimum.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 중재판정부의 구성과 법원의 역할

Ⅲ. 관련 판례 분석

Ⅳ. 결론

참고문헌

ABSTRACT

키워드

중재판정부 중재인 선정 중재법 제12조 항고 Arbitral TribunalAppointment of Arbitrators Arbitration Act of Korea Article 12 Appeal