UNCITRAL의 최근 동향 -1976년 UNCITRAL 중재규칙 개정안의 제3회독을 중심으로

• 영문명: Recent Developments : The Third Reading of the Revised Version of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules of 1976
• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: 강병근
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』 제20권 제2호, 3~26쪽, 전체 24쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.08.30

영문 초록

In 2006, the UNCITRAL Working Group Ⅱ started a new project on the revision of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules of 1976. Ever since that time, 9 sessions of the Working Group Ⅱ were devoted to the discussions on such topic. The Arbitration Rules has been acknowledged to be used for settling international disputes involving various disputing parties. In recent years, many treaty-based arbitrations have been subject to the Arbitration Rules. This article focuses on the discussions made in the 52nd session of the Working Group Ⅱ where the third reading of the revised draft of the Arbitration Rules was completed except for a few provisions. Among the draft rules, the delegations were hardly able to reach an agreement with regard to Articles 2(2), 34(2), 41(3), (4), and (6). It is expected that those provisions would be agreed in the coming 43rd plenary session of the UNCITRAL. The use of the Arbitration Rules is dependent on the agreement by the disputing parties. It is not like the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration which was adopted in Korean legal system in 1999. However, the proper functioning of arbitration rules is essential for the efficient and successful operation of the arbitration system in a particular country. That is the reason why we should keep close attention on the discussions of the UNCITRAL with regard to the revision of the Arbitration Rules.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 각종 통지 방법 : 제2(2)조

Ⅲ. 중재인 면책 규정 신설

Ⅳ. 중재판정부가 선임한 감정인 : 제29조

Ⅴ. 중재판정의 형식과 효과 : 제34(2)조

Ⅵ. 중재비용판단의 검토 : 제41조

Ⅶ. 중재판정의 중재비용 관련 내용 : 제40조 혹은 제42조

Ⅷ. 결론

참고문헌

ABSTRACT

키워드

통지 면책 감정인 중재판정 중재비용 communication exemption from liability expert arbitral award cost of arbitration