본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

미국 원주민 유물 처리 문제와 반환법의 역사적 의미

이용수 43

영문명
Native Americans and the Meaning of the Repatriation Movement
발행기관
한국아메리카학회
저자명
박진빈(Jinbin Park)
간행물 정보
『미국학논집』제43집 2호, 147~170쪽, 전체 24쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 기타인문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2011.09.30
5,680

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

This paper explains the meaning of the ‘Kennewick Man’ incident and discusses its impact in the field of American history. The skull and bones of a man found in the bank of Columbia River in Kennewick, Washington in 1996. The age of this human remain was estimated more than 6000 upto 9000 years, and the national and international interest grew. Under the NAGPRA, the remains of the Native American ancestors should be returned to the descendents for reburial; however, the Kennewick Man has not been returned and still stored at the museum. To investigate the Kennewick Man case, this paper goes back to the history of the Native Americans since the 19th Century. As the white Americans’ movement toward the west advanced, the Native American’s right to the land was denied. They were evacuated from the mother land, and contained in the reserved areas. Especially the creation of the national parks and the advancement of imperialism increased the mistreatment of the Native American rights. The Native Americans’ graves were also tore up and their relics and remains became the resources for scientific researches or public display. Many descendents of different tribes struggled to stop the mistreatment of their ancestral legacy. The establishment of the NAGPRA, which stipulated the return of all Native American remains and holy matters to the proper descendents, was the result of their effort. However, the Kennewich Man case revealed the complex nature of the Native American history and the difficulties of implementing the NAGPRA. The disputes over the Kennewick Man’s racial identity, whether he could be considered as an ancestor of the present day Native American, led to the lawsuit that lasted four years. The court’s final decision declared that no direct kinship relation was found between this skeletal remnants and the present day tribal people. Therefore, the Kennewick Man was not returned to the Native Americans. It is still stored at a museum and the owner of the land where the bones were found have the right to the Kennewick Man.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 자연과 원주민의 영토화: 국립공원과 보호구역
Ⅲ. 분묘의 발굴과 전시: ‘죽은’ 원주민의 위치
Ⅳ. 반환법과 케네윅 맨
Ⅴ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

박진빈(Jinbin Park). (2011).미국 원주민 유물 처리 문제와 반환법의 역사적 의미. 미국학논집, 43 (2), 147-170

MLA

박진빈(Jinbin Park). "미국 원주민 유물 처리 문제와 반환법의 역사적 의미." 미국학논집, 43.2(2011): 147-170

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제