학술논문
루스벨트의 동유럽 외교정책: ‘외교정책 자문위원회’와 동유럽, 소련의 대응
이용수 87
- 영문명
- Roosevelt's Foreign Policy on East Europe
- 발행기관
- 한국외국어대학교 동유럽발칸연구소
- 저자명
- 김지영(Ji-Young Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『동유럽발칸연구』동유럽연구 제10권 제1호, 181~201쪽, 전체 21쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 정치외교학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2001.08.30
5,320원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
President Roosevelt approved the Department of State's setting up of
the Advisory Committee on Post-War Foreign Policy in December 28,
1941, Its task was to work out the policies that would guide the U.S. in
the postwar negotiation on peace. Though under other names, the
Committee continued to function, in fact until the end of the war.
The Advisory Committee included not just scholars and university
professors, but also leading associates of the Department of State.
Advisory committee started its work in December 28, 1941. The task of
the Advisory Committee was to make an idea for postwar economic and
political cooperation between the countries of Eastern Europe.
Of the concrete proposals discussed, four were considered particularly
carefully: those of Wladislaw Sikorski, of Edvard Benes, of Otto von
Habsburg, and the plan jointly sorted out by Tibor Eckhardt and János
Pelényi. Silkorski, the head of the London-based Polish governmentin-
exile, advocated a loose, primarily economic confederation of all the
states lying between the Baltic Sea and the Adriatic, and Germany and
the Soviet Union. Benes's idea, which enjoyed the support of a number
of the exiled politicians of the countries concerned, was two
confederations: a Balkan federation centering on Yugoslavia and Greece,
and a Central European federation centering on Poland and
Czechoslovakia. Archduke Otto's proposal was a Danubian federation of
the lands of the former Habsburg Monarchy, one in which dynastic and
national aspirations were reconciled in the spirit of the twentieth century. Through this never concretely specified, it was clear that he
himself was to be the Habsburg at the helm of this federation. The
Eckhardt-Pelényi proposal envisioned three loosely-knit federative unite,
the Balkan, the Polish-Baltic, and the Danubian-the last much like the
Danubian Union envisioned by Archduke Otto, consisting of Austria,
Hungary, Bohemia, Slovakia, Transylvania and perhaps Croatia.
The Advisory Committee examined the above proposals from two
salient points of view: security and economic viability. The security
consideration mean that they wanted the new federation to be proof
against a possible German or Russian attack. Both security and
economic considerations argued for the The Advisory Committee's
taking a stand for the largest and strongest units possible, already at its
very first sitting. This ruled out the Eckhardt-Pelényi plan for a
tripartite region, and also Archduke Otto's proposal, which had left out
the Balkans and the Polish-Baltic Sea region. What remained was
Sikorski's suggestion, and perhaps Benes's.
By the end of 1943, U.S. diplomacy had more or less officially agreed
to let Stalin have his way in Eastern Europe. In the course of the
Moscow and Teheran conferences, it became an accepted fact that
Central and Eastern Europe were particularly significant form the point
of view of Soviet security, and that this gave Moscow certain
privileges.
목차
Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 본 론
Ⅲ. 결 론
참 고 문 헌
<< Abstract >>
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 이온 미눌레스쿠(Ion Minulescu)의 작품세계 연구
- 제 1차 세계대전과 유고슬라비아
- 유고슬라비아주의와 언어문제
- 밀로라드 파비치와 포스트모더니즘
- 체제전환기의 엘리트와 민주주의
- 루스벨트의 동유럽 외교정책: ‘외교정책 자문위원회’와 동유럽, 소련의 대응
- 중부유럽: 그 지리적, 역사적 범위
- EU 확대와 동유럽 경제의 변화
- 1989년 체제변환 이후 폴란드 문학의 경향
- The Prospectives of the Economic Cooperation between Hungary and the Republic of Korea Focusing on the Food-and Agricultural Sector
- Decade of Polish Transformation: Achievements and Problems
- 유고슬라비아의 해체와 이보 안드리치(Ivo Andrić)
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!