한국 근대소설과 연애담론 - 1920년대 「동아일보」 연재소설을 중심으로

• 영문명: Korean Modern Novels and Discourse on Love - Focusing on Serial Stories Published in Dong-A Ilbo in the 1920s
• 발행기관: 한국문학회
• 저자명: 최미진(Choi Mi-Jin) 임주탁(Yim Ju-Tak)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국문학논총』제44집, 245~291쪽, 전체 47쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 한국어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2006.12.01

영문 초록

  This paper aims at studying the characteristics of the discourse on love in the serial novels published in newspapers, including Na Do-hyang"s The Drama of Illusion, Lee Hui-cheol"s Eup-hyul-jo and Yeom Sang-seop"s What Did You Get?, in the mid-1920s, when the Dong-A Ilbo served as a venue for a public discourse. Taking a closer look at the discourse on women prevalent in the Dong-A Ilbo at the time revealed that the discourse on women"s education and the discourse on women"s liberation had been undergoing a series of conflicts. The discourse on love in the serial stories published in newspapers showed similar characteristics as well.
  First of all, one thing the three novels have in common was that both the subject and the object of love were modern intellectuals. Modern knowledge meant conditions for love and qualifications to enjoy a modern culture. This has something to do with the reality of the time when the modern intellectuals emerged as a new group in power. It was problematic, however, that the subjects of love in the three novels embraced the internal coloniality in the process of accepting the modern knowledge.
  Second, the three novels considered the modern love of the West to be a standard and idealized the western model. Here lies the conflicts between the western-style romantic love, described as a standard, and Ellen Key"s free love and Henrik Ibsen"s Noraism.
  Third, it was virginity that was emphasized as a prerequisite for the subject of love, women. The loss of virginity in itself represented a fallen love, so those women were excluded from the objects of love. The novels took women"s moral degradation for granted, based on the sole and absolute criteria of virginity. This might be a result of putting the reality of the time in context, when the goal of education for women was to nurture a "wise mother and good wife."
  Fourth, money-centric materialism served as a major variant in a love relationship. Along with the loss of women"s virginity, materialism was facing a critical discourse, because it ran counter to the innocence of love.
  Fifth, the subjects of discourse in three of the two novels, except for Eup-hyul-jo, were male characters representing the viewpoints of authors. This might be because of the fact that it was men who wrote those three novels, but also because the male-centered attitude had a big influence on a love relationship. The novels had a modern thinking system of the "modernity/traditions or Japan/Joseon" in action, which was used as a logic to justify a modern love and a love marriage. They also had risks, however, of being exposed to or assimilated into the coloniality of the Japanese colonial rule, in that Japan was described to have a comparative advantage.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 「동아일보」와 여성 담론
Ⅲ. 근대적 연애 모델과 연애의 환상성-《幻戱》의 경우
Ⅳ. 연애의 신성과 타락한 연애의 지표들- 《泣血鳥》의 경우
Ⅴ. 연애의 지식모델과 자유연애론의 진단들- 《너희들은 무엇을 어덧느냐》의 경우
Ⅵ. 마무리
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

키워드

1920년대 동아일보 근대소설 연애 연애담론 여성담론 나도향 이희철 염상섭 《幻戱》 《泣血조》 《너희들은 무엇을 어덧느냐》 현모양처 낭만적 사랑 엘렌 케이 노라리즘 육체적 순결 물질성 담론주체 식민성 식민주의 in the 1920s Dong-A Ilbo modern novels love discourse on love discourse on women Na Do hyang Lee Hui-cheol Yeom Sang-seop The Drama of Illusion Eup-hyul-jo What Did You Get? " a wise mother and good wife" free love romantic love Ellen Key Noraism physical virginity materialism subject of discourse coloniality colonialism