본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

[논문]전자기록위작·변작행위의 규제법규에 관한 연구 - 문제점을 중심으로 -

이용수 125

영문명
[Article]A Study on The Laws Against Counterfeiting/Altering Electronic Records
발행기관
한국형사법학회
저자명
류석준(Ryu Seok-Jun)
간행물 정보
『형사법연구』형사법연구 제23권, 137~155쪽, 전체 19쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2005.06.01
5,080

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

There are penalty cracks in the criminal provisions related with the crime of electronic records. For example, the revised criminal law cannot protect the data which are being transmitted. Furthermore, unreal public electronic records written without authority cannot be punished by existing criminal law. But the majority of opinions have suggested that the latter problem could be solved through the interpretation of the law. In other words, they have said that composing unreal public data is only data counterfeiting act, because the conception of counterfeiting data includes the behavior of unreal public data composition. But this interpretation raises contradiction with the existing legal system. The forgery of document has been strictly discriminated from the composition of unreal document by someone without authority. Moreover each provision prescribes a different amount of legal penalties. In spite of discord with this existing legal system, persisting in majority opinions means an expansion of penalty without clear basis. In addition, they also propose inconsistent theories in the interpretative solution. According to their opinions, cognition of the meaning of prescription is required to realize willfulness. Of course its level is one of legal outsider. Then it is notably questionable and impossible for him to recognize that the conception of counterfeiting data includes the behavior of unreal public data composition, because the existing legal system requires strict discrimination between the forgery of document and the composition of unreal document. Therefore the interpretative theory fails to fill up the penalty cracks. This problem can be solved only by enactment. There are special laws to protect the data being transmitted. But all data cannot be protected. Only the data on computer-communication network in distribution industry is being protected. Except them, penalty vacuum still exists in the rest of data being transmitted. And the penalty of special law is much heavier than that of criminal law. Though the criminal law has strictly discriminated the public electronic records from private ones, special law treats them equally. This means the unbalance of penalty. Improvement is urgent.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 형법의 처벌규정
Ⅲ. 특별법의 처벌규정
Ⅳ. 결론
[Abstract]

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

류석준(Ryu Seok-Jun). (2005).[논문]전자기록위작·변작행위의 규제법규에 관한 연구 - 문제점을 중심으로 -. 형사법연구, 23 , 137-155

MLA

류석준(Ryu Seok-Jun). "[논문]전자기록위작·변작행위의 규제법규에 관한 연구 - 문제점을 중심으로 -." 형사법연구, 23.(2005): 137-155

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제